summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>2013-10-28 16:55:29 +0400
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2013-10-29 15:01:19 +0400
commitbf378d341e4873ed928dc3c636252e6895a21f50 (patch)
treedf69751e469725f2e23da8404884b5540d1bcddc /include
parentcd65718712469ad844467250e8fad20a5838baae (diff)
downloadlinux-bf378d341e4873ed928dc3c636252e6895a21f50.tar.xz
perf: Fix perf ring buffer memory ordering
The PPC64 people noticed a missing memory barrier and crufty old comments in the perf ring buffer code. So update all the comments and add the missing barrier. When the architecture implements local_t using atomic_long_t there will be double barriers issued; but short of introducing more conditional barrier primitives this is the best we can do. Reported-by: Victor Kaplansky <victork@il.ibm.com> Tested-by: Victor Kaplansky <victork@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Cc: michael@ellerman.id.au Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: anton@samba.org Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20131025173749.GG19466@laptop.lan Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
-rw-r--r--include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h12
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
index 009a655a5d35..2fc1602e23bb 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -456,13 +456,15 @@ struct perf_event_mmap_page {
/*
* Control data for the mmap() data buffer.
*
- * User-space reading the @data_head value should issue an rmb(), on
- * SMP capable platforms, after reading this value -- see
- * perf_event_wakeup().
+ * User-space reading the @data_head value should issue an smp_rmb(),
+ * after reading this value.
*
* When the mapping is PROT_WRITE the @data_tail value should be
- * written by userspace to reflect the last read data. In this case
- * the kernel will not over-write unread data.
+ * written by userspace to reflect the last read data, after issueing
+ * an smp_mb() to separate the data read from the ->data_tail store.
+ * In this case the kernel will not over-write unread data.
+ *
+ * See perf_output_put_handle() for the data ordering.
*/
__u64 data_head; /* head in the data section */
__u64 data_tail; /* user-space written tail */