summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/net
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>2013-07-01 16:12:40 +0400
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2013-07-22 05:19:00 +0400
commit3cba6eb1c7cd51176b972ae47736d8e7a0720706 (patch)
tree28ec853cb9bd3fdefd7e8a5f2bf63772295c9fac /include/net
parent76a4f3b621d867ea7e27a1b985d7e1430355fac6 (diff)
downloadlinux-3cba6eb1c7cd51176b972ae47736d8e7a0720706.tar.xz
jbd2: fix theoretical race in jbd2__journal_restart
commit 39c04153fda8c32e85b51c96eb5511a326ad7609 upstream. Once we decrement transaction->t_updates, if this is the last handle holding the transaction from closing, and once we release the t_handle_lock spinlock, it's possible for the transaction to commit and be released. In practice with normal kernels, this probably won't happen, since the commit happens in a separate kernel thread and it's unlikely this could all happen within the space of a few CPU cycles. On the other hand, with a real-time kernel, this could potentially happen, so save the tid found in transaction->t_tid before we release t_handle_lock. It would require an insane configuration, such as one where the jbd2 thread was set to a very high real-time priority, perhaps because a high priority real-time thread is trying to read or write to a file system. But some people who use real-time kernels have been known to do insane things, including controlling laser-wielding industrial robots. :-) Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/net')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions