cpufreq: Fix setting policy limits when frequency tables are used

commit b79028039f440e7d2c4df6ab243060c4e3803e84 upstream.

Commit 7491cdf46b5c ("cpufreq: Avoid using inconsistent policy->min and
policy->max") overlooked the fact that policy->min and policy->max were
accessed directly in cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and in the
functions called by it.  Consequently, the changes made by that commit
led to problems with setting policy limits.

Address this by passing the target frequency limits to __resolve_freq()
and cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and propagating them to the
functions called by the latter.

Fixes: 7491cdf46b5c ("cpufreq: Avoid using inconsistent policy->min and policy->max")
Cc: 5.16+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.16+
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/aAplED3IA_J0eZN0@linaro.org/
Reported-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5896780.DvuYhMxLoT@rjwysocki.net
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 54 insertions, 29 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 3759d0a15c7b..d87a0d024693 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -789,8 +789,8 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy,
 int cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy);
 
 int cpufreq_table_index_unsorted(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
-				 unsigned int target_freq,
-				 unsigned int relation);
+				 unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int min,
+				 unsigned int max, unsigned int relation);
 int cpufreq_frequency_table_get_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 		unsigned int freq);
 
@@ -855,12 +855,12 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_dl(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	return best;
 }
 
-/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */
-static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_l(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
-					     unsigned int target_freq,
-					     bool efficiencies)
+static inline int find_index_l(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+			       unsigned int target_freq,
+			       unsigned int min, unsigned int max,
+			       bool efficiencies)
 {
-	target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max);
+	target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, min, max);
 
 	if (policy->freq_table_sorted == CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_ASCENDING)
 		return cpufreq_table_find_index_al(policy, target_freq,
@@ -870,6 +870,14 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_l(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 						   efficiencies);
 }
 
+/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */
+static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_l(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+					     unsigned int target_freq,
+					     bool efficiencies)
+{
+	return find_index_l(policy, target_freq, policy->min, policy->max, efficiencies);
+}
+
 /* Find highest freq at or below target in a table in ascending order */
 static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_ah(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 					      unsigned int target_freq,
@@ -923,12 +931,12 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_dh(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	return best;
 }
 
-/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */
-static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_h(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
-					     unsigned int target_freq,
-					     bool efficiencies)
+static inline int find_index_h(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+			       unsigned int target_freq,
+			       unsigned int min, unsigned int max,
+			       bool efficiencies)
 {
-	target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max);
+	target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, min, max);
 
 	if (policy->freq_table_sorted == CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_ASCENDING)
 		return cpufreq_table_find_index_ah(policy, target_freq,
@@ -938,6 +946,14 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_h(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 						   efficiencies);
 }
 
+/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */
+static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_h(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+					     unsigned int target_freq,
+					     bool efficiencies)
+{
+	return find_index_h(policy, target_freq, policy->min, policy->max, efficiencies);
+}
+
 /* Find closest freq to target in a table in ascending order */
 static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_ac(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 					      unsigned int target_freq,
@@ -1008,12 +1024,12 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_dc(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	return best;
 }
 
-/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */
-static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_c(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
-					     unsigned int target_freq,
-					     bool efficiencies)
+static inline int find_index_c(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+			       unsigned int target_freq,
+			       unsigned int min, unsigned int max,
+			       bool efficiencies)
 {
-	target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max);
+	target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, min, max);
 
 	if (policy->freq_table_sorted == CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_ASCENDING)
 		return cpufreq_table_find_index_ac(policy, target_freq,
@@ -1023,7 +1039,17 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_c(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 						   efficiencies);
 }
 
-static inline bool cpufreq_is_in_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int idx)
+/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */
+static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_c(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+					     unsigned int target_freq,
+					     bool efficiencies)
+{
+	return find_index_c(policy, target_freq, policy->min, policy->max, efficiencies);
+}
+
+static inline bool cpufreq_is_in_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+					unsigned int min, unsigned int max,
+					int idx)
 {
 	unsigned int freq;
 
@@ -1032,11 +1058,13 @@ static inline bool cpufreq_is_in_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int idx)
 
 	freq = policy->freq_table[idx].frequency;
 
-	return freq == clamp_val(freq, policy->min, policy->max);
+	return freq == clamp_val(freq, min, max);
 }
 
 static inline int cpufreq_frequency_table_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 						 unsigned int target_freq,
+						 unsigned int min,
+						 unsigned int max,
 						 unsigned int relation)
 {
 	bool efficiencies = policy->efficiencies_available &&
@@ -1047,29 +1075,26 @@ static inline int cpufreq_frequency_table_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	relation &= ~CPUFREQ_RELATION_E;
 
 	if (unlikely(policy->freq_table_sorted == CPUFREQ_TABLE_UNSORTED))
-		return cpufreq_table_index_unsorted(policy, target_freq,
-						    relation);
+		return cpufreq_table_index_unsorted(policy, target_freq, min,
+						    max, relation);
 retry:
 	switch (relation) {
 	case CPUFREQ_RELATION_L:
-		idx = cpufreq_table_find_index_l(policy, target_freq,
-						 efficiencies);
+		idx = find_index_l(policy, target_freq, min, max, efficiencies);
 		break;
 	case CPUFREQ_RELATION_H:
-		idx = cpufreq_table_find_index_h(policy, target_freq,
-						 efficiencies);
+		idx = find_index_h(policy, target_freq, min, max, efficiencies);
 		break;
 	case CPUFREQ_RELATION_C:
-		idx = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, target_freq,
-						 efficiencies);
+		idx = find_index_c(policy, target_freq, min, max, efficiencies);
 		break;
 	default:
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	/* Limit frequency index to honor policy->min/max */
-	if (!cpufreq_is_in_limits(policy, idx) && efficiencies) {
+	/* Limit frequency index to honor min and max */
+	if (!cpufreq_is_in_limits(policy, min, max, idx) && efficiencies) {
 		efficiencies = false;
 		goto retry;
 	}