tcp/dccp: fix possible race __inet_lookup_established()

Michal Kubecek and Firo Yang did a very nice analysis of crashes
happening in __inet_lookup_established().

Since a TCP socket can go from TCP_ESTABLISH to TCP_LISTEN
(via a close()/socket()/listen() cycle) without a RCU grace period,
I should not have changed listeners linkage in their hash table.

They must use the nulls protocol (Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.txt),
so that a lookup can detect a socket in a hash list was moved in
another one.

Since we added code in commit d296ba60d8e2 ("soreuseport: Resolve
merge conflict for v4/v6 ordering fix"), we have to add
hlist_nulls_add_tail_rcu() helper.

Fixes: 3b24d854cb35 ("tcp/dccp: do not touch listener sk_refcnt under synflood")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Reported-by: Firo Yang <firo.yang@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20191120083919.GH27852@unicorn.suse.cz/
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>

1 files changed, 37 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h b/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h
index bc8206a8f30e..61974c4c566b 100644
--- a/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h
+++ b/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h
@@ -101,6 +101,43 @@ static inline void hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(struct hlist_nulls_node *n,
 }
 
 /**
+ * hlist_nulls_add_tail_rcu
+ * @n: the element to add to the hash list.
+ * @h: the list to add to.
+ *
+ * Description:
+ * Adds the specified element to the specified hlist_nulls,
+ * while permitting racing traversals.
+ *
+ * The caller must take whatever precautions are necessary
+ * (such as holding appropriate locks) to avoid racing
+ * with another list-mutation primitive, such as hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu()
+ * or hlist_nulls_del_rcu(), running on this same list.
+ * However, it is perfectly legal to run concurrently with
+ * the _rcu list-traversal primitives, such as
+ * hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu(), used to prevent memory-consistency
+ * problems on Alpha CPUs.  Regardless of the type of CPU, the
+ * list-traversal primitive must be guarded by rcu_read_lock().
+ */
+static inline void hlist_nulls_add_tail_rcu(struct hlist_nulls_node *n,
+					    struct hlist_nulls_head *h)
+{
+	struct hlist_nulls_node *i, *last = NULL;
+
+	/* Note: write side code, so rcu accessors are not needed. */
+	for (i = h->first; !is_a_nulls(i); i = i->next)
+		last = i;
+
+	if (last) {
+		n->next = last->next;
+		n->pprev = &last->next;
+		rcu_assign_pointer(hlist_next_rcu(last), n);
+	} else {
+		hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(n, h);
+	}
+}
+
+/**
  * hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu - iterate over rcu list of given type
  * @tpos:	the type * to use as a loop cursor.
  * @pos:	the &struct hlist_nulls_node to use as a loop cursor.