summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/linux/ptdump.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>2020-02-28 17:01:43 +0300
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2020-02-28 23:08:37 +0300
commite955376277839db92774ec24d559ab42442b95fc (patch)
tree9d3738f3acf1bb233d3f99113841990e643ca8fa /include/linux/ptdump.h
parent749db093040788ff474937d2452d4cf0176b5a1f (diff)
downloadlinux-e955376277839db92774ec24d559ab42442b95fc.tar.xz
af_unix: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/ptdump.h')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions