summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/linux/mfd
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBrian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>2016-07-16 02:28:42 +0300
committerThierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>2016-07-25 11:33:03 +0300
commit2b66bd692c40034d42d905f37f7f20c3540f185e (patch)
tree9da4e7a642a6ea443de3ef208c78ce7eb414bf01 /include/linux/mfd
parent9798ac6d32c1a32d6d92d853ff507d2d39c4300c (diff)
downloadlinux-2b66bd692c40034d42d905f37f7f20c3540f185e.tar.xz
mfd: cros_ec: Add EC_PWM function definitions
The EC_CMD_PWM_{GET,SET}_DUTY commands allow us to control a PWM that is attached to the EC, rather than the main host SoC. The API provides functionality-based (e.g., keyboard light, backlight) or index-based addressing of the PWM(s). Duty cycles are represented by a 16-bit value, where 0 maps to 0% duty cycle and U16_MAX maps to 100%. The period cannot be controlled. This command set is more generic than, e.g., EC_CMD_PWM_{GET,SET}_KEYBOARD_BACKLIGHT and could possibly used to replace it on future products. Let's update the command header to include the definitions. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/mfd')
-rw-r--r--include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h31
1 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h
index 13b630c10d4c..7e7a8d4b4551 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h
@@ -949,6 +949,37 @@ struct ec_params_pwm_set_fan_duty {
uint32_t percent;
} __packed;
+#define EC_CMD_PWM_SET_DUTY 0x25
+/* 16 bit duty cycle, 0xffff = 100% */
+#define EC_PWM_MAX_DUTY 0xffff
+
+enum ec_pwm_type {
+ /* All types, indexed by board-specific enum pwm_channel */
+ EC_PWM_TYPE_GENERIC = 0,
+ /* Keyboard backlight */
+ EC_PWM_TYPE_KB_LIGHT,
+ /* Display backlight */
+ EC_PWM_TYPE_DISPLAY_LIGHT,
+ EC_PWM_TYPE_COUNT,
+};
+
+struct ec_params_pwm_set_duty {
+ uint16_t duty; /* Duty cycle, EC_PWM_MAX_DUTY = 100% */
+ uint8_t pwm_type; /* ec_pwm_type */
+ uint8_t index; /* Type-specific index, or 0 if unique */
+} __packed;
+
+#define EC_CMD_PWM_GET_DUTY 0x26
+
+struct ec_params_pwm_get_duty {
+ uint8_t pwm_type; /* ec_pwm_type */
+ uint8_t index; /* Type-specific index, or 0 if unique */
+} __packed;
+
+struct ec_response_pwm_get_duty {
+ uint16_t duty; /* Duty cycle, EC_PWM_MAX_DUTY = 100% */
+} __packed;
+
/*****************************************************************************/
/*
* Lightbar commands. This looks worse than it is. Since we only use one HOST