diff options
author | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> | 2017-07-19 01:25:30 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> | 2017-08-01 22:03:04 +0300 |
commit | a9208e42ba99bfe63bdf5f76aaf0193ad3805f02 (patch) | |
tree | 28a82e9295894afd8410a62a60936cc68eb8c756 /include/linux/binfmts.h | |
parent | ddb4a1442def2a78b91a85b4251fb712ef23662b (diff) | |
download | linux-a9208e42ba99bfe63bdf5f76aaf0193ad3805f02.tar.xz |
exec: Correct comments about "point of no return"
In commit 221af7f87b97 ("Split 'flush_old_exec' into two functions"),
the comment about the point of no return should have stayed in
flush_old_exec() since it refers to "bprm->mm = NULL;" line, but prior
changes in commits c89681ed7d0e ("remove steal_locks()"), and
fd8328be874f ("sanitize handling of shared descriptor tables in failing
execve()") made it look like it meant the current->sas_ss_sp line instead.
The comment was referring to the fact that once bprm->mm is NULL, all
failures from a binfmt load_binary hook (e.g. load_elf_binary), will
get SEGV raised against current. Move this comment and expand the
explanation a bit, putting it above the assignment this time, and add
details about the true nature of "point of no return" being the call
to flush_old_exec() itself.
This also removes an erroneous commet about when credentials are being
installed. That has its own dedicated function, install_exec_creds(),
which carries a similar (and correct) comment, so remove the bogus comment
where installation is not actually happening.
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/binfmts.h')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions