summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/kunit/test.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>2022-10-01 03:26:37 +0300
committerShuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>2022-12-13 00:13:47 +0300
commit697365c086791372945037557f99bc164e2db855 (patch)
treed2eb60b5634c34fed99c391c462c55df97fac34f /include/kunit/test.h
parent101e32a025da386ba6f6efbfe3e75b6ec5a358aa (diff)
downloadlinux-697365c086791372945037557f99bc164e2db855.tar.xz
kunit: eliminate KUNIT_INIT_*_ASSERT_STRUCT macros
These macros exist because passing an initializer list to other macros is hard. The goal of these macros is to generate a line like struct $ASSERT_TYPE __assertion = $APPROPRIATE_INITIALIZER; e.g. struct kunit_unary_assertion __assertion = { .condition = "foo()", .expected_true = true }; But the challenge is you can't pass `{.condition=..., .expect_true=...}` as a macro argument, since the comma means you're actually passing two arguments, `{.condition=...` and `.expect_true=....}`. So we'd made custom macros for each different initializer-list shape. But we can work around this with the following generic macro #define KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(initializers...) { initializers } Note: this has the downside that we have to rename some macros arguments to not conflict with the struct field names (e.g. `expected_true`). It's a bit gross, but probably worth reducing the # of macros. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/kunit/test.h')
-rw-r--r--include/kunit/test.h27
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index cde97dc4eed5..d7f60e8aab30 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -515,22 +515,25 @@ void kunit_do_failed_assertion(struct kunit *test,
fmt, \
##__VA_ARGS__)
+/* Helper to safely pass around an initializer list to other macros. */
+#define KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(initializers...) { initializers }
+
#define KUNIT_UNARY_ASSERTION(test, \
assert_type, \
- condition, \
- expected_true, \
+ condition_, \
+ expected_true_, \
fmt, \
...) \
do { \
- if (likely(!!(condition) == !!expected_true)) \
+ if (likely(!!(condition_) == !!expected_true_)) \
break; \
\
_KUNIT_FAILED(test, \
assert_type, \
kunit_unary_assert, \
kunit_unary_assert_format, \
- KUNIT_INIT_UNARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(#condition, \
- expected_true), \
+ KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.condition = #condition_, \
+ .expected_true = expected_true_), \
fmt, \
##__VA_ARGS__); \
} while (0)
@@ -590,9 +593,9 @@ do { \
assert_type, \
assert_class, \
format_func, \
- KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(&__text, \
- __left, \
- __right), \
+ KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = &__text, \
+ .left_value = __left, \
+ .right_value = __right), \
fmt, \
##__VA_ARGS__); \
} while (0)
@@ -651,9 +654,9 @@ do { \
assert_type, \
kunit_binary_str_assert, \
kunit_binary_str_assert_format, \
- KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(&__text, \
- __left, \
- __right), \
+ KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = &__text, \
+ .left_value = __left, \
+ .right_value = __right), \
fmt, \
##__VA_ARGS__); \
} while (0)
@@ -706,7 +709,7 @@ do { \
assert_type, \
kunit_ptr_not_err_assert, \
kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format, \
- KUNIT_INIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_STRUCT(#ptr, __ptr), \
+ KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \
fmt, \
##__VA_ARGS__); \
} while (0)