diff options
| author | Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> | 2015-03-05 01:34:32 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> | 2015-03-05 01:34:32 +0300 |
| commit | 0164bf0239777811bdc3e01f45501174dc6db19d (patch) | |
| tree | ab038158e85748e6769dea13004c5a9591d10f1a /fs | |
| parent | 6587457b4b3d663b237a0f95ddf6e67d1828c8ea (diff) | |
| download | linux-0164bf0239777811bdc3e01f45501174dc6db19d.tar.xz | |
locks: fix fasync_struct memory leak in lease upgrade/downgrade handling
Commit 8634b51f6ca2 (locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context)
introduced a regression in the handling of lease upgrade/downgrades.
In the event that we already have a lease on a file and are going to
either upgrade or downgrade it, we skip doing any list insertion or
deletion and simply re-call lm_setup on the existing lease.
As of commit 8634b51f6ca2 however, we end up calling lm_setup on the
lease that was passed in, instead of on the existing lease. This causes
us to leak the fasync_struct that was allocated in the event that there
was not already an existing one (as it always appeared that there
wasn't one).
Fixes: 8634b51f6ca2 (locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context)
Reported-and-Tested-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/locks.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c index 365c82e1b3a9..f1bad681fc1c 100644 --- a/fs/locks.c +++ b/fs/locks.c @@ -1665,7 +1665,8 @@ generic_add_lease(struct file *filp, long arg, struct file_lock **flp, void **pr } if (my_fl != NULL) { - error = lease->fl_lmops->lm_change(my_fl, arg, &dispose); + lease = my_fl; + error = lease->fl_lmops->lm_change(lease, arg, &dispose); if (error) goto out; goto out_setup; |