diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2017-10-18 13:47:59 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2017-10-18 13:47:59 +0300 |
commit | 3e0cc09a3a2c40ec1ffb6b4e12da86e98feccb11 (patch) | |
tree | 4a00438f8777cdbed5558277606b1fb0d7bc993b /fs | |
parent | 96b0e525af62eb3dcc084b091b40add082467150 (diff) | |
parent | 9ed95129ffcabbde564b40ffbbf9c26e8702d858 (diff) | |
download | linux-3e0cc09a3a2c40ec1ffb6b4e12da86e98feccb11.tar.xz |
Merge tag 'enforcement-4.14-rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core
Pull enforcement policy update from Greg KH:
"Documentation: Add a file explaining the requested Linux kernel
license enforcement policy
Here's a new file to the kernel's Documentation directory. It adds a
short document describing the views of how the Linux kernel community
feels about enforcing the license of the kernel.
The patch has been reviewed by a large number of kernel developers
already, as seen by their acks on the patch, and their agreement of
the statement with their names on it. The location of the file was
also agreed upon by the Documentation maintainer, so all should be
good there.
For some background information about this statement, see this article
written by some of the kernel developers involved in drafting it:
http://kroah.com/log/blog/2017/10/16/linux-kernel-community-enforcement-statement/
and this article that answers a number of questions that came up in
the discussion of this statement with the kernel developer community:
http://kroah.com/log/blog/2017/10/16/linux-kernel-community-enforcement-statement-faq/
If anyone has any further questions about it, please let me, and the
TAB members, know and we will be glad to help answer them"
* tag 'enforcement-4.14-rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core:
Documentation: Add a file explaining the Linux kernel license enforcement policy
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions