diff options
author | Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> | 2019-07-04 18:32:23 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> | 2019-07-23 21:43:17 +0300 |
commit | d5d5bd909a4f03f132ee3fd3f6f0568c8344eee5 (patch) | |
tree | 89ddfd35ca35e0447f3c007ac0580e915c28c2e9 /fs/jfs/jfs_dtree.c | |
parent | cf2df8f10789ca4ad27ad0217332c2bfe6fe4c26 (diff) | |
download | linux-d5d5bd909a4f03f132ee3fd3f6f0568c8344eee5.tar.xz |
ptrace: Fix ->ptracer_cred handling for PTRACE_TRACEME
commit 6994eefb0053799d2e07cd140df6c2ea106c41ee upstream.
Fix two issues:
When called for PTRACE_TRACEME, ptrace_link() would obtain an RCU
reference to the parent's objective credentials, then give that pointer
to get_cred(). However, the object lifetime rules for things like
struct cred do not permit unconditionally turning an RCU reference into
a stable reference.
PTRACE_TRACEME records the parent's credentials as if the parent was
acting as the subject, but that's not the case. If a malicious
unprivileged child uses PTRACE_TRACEME and the parent is privileged, and
at a later point, the parent process becomes attacker-controlled
(because it drops privileges and calls execve()), the attacker ends up
with control over two processes with a privileged ptrace relationship,
which can be abused to ptrace a suid binary and obtain root privileges.
Fix both of these by always recording the credentials of the process
that is requesting the creation of the ptrace relationship:
current_cred() can't change under us, and current is the proper subject
for access control.
This change is theoretically userspace-visible, but I am not aware of
any code that it will actually break.
Fixes: 64b875f7ac8a ("ptrace: Capture the ptracer's creds not PT_PTRACE_CAP")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/jfs/jfs_dtree.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions