diff options
author | Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> | 2020-03-09 23:27:15 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> | 2020-03-16 17:57:09 +0300 |
commit | 3fc131663cec7ca8e05bf25d99cecc2ab56bc50d (patch) | |
tree | 94e713eab31cf0359d12e92e52f0301ef76b1e2f /fs/jffs2/xattr.c | |
parent | c2d0699c629d30dde3329003baac3b94f1d717e6 (diff) | |
download | linux-3fc131663cec7ca8e05bf25d99cecc2ab56bc50d.tar.xz |
udf: udf_sb.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200309202715.GA9428@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/jffs2/xattr.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions