diff options
author | Artem B. Bityuckiy <dedekind@infradead.org> | 2005-07-13 00:58:12 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org> | 2005-07-13 03:00:59 +0400 |
commit | 4120db47198d21d8cd3b2cdbbe1ea6118a50bcd4 (patch) | |
tree | b4e0b69dbf3d2da69aa49423227a1da6036e9566 /fs/inode.c | |
parent | 168a9fd6a1bf91041adf9909f6c72cf747f0ca8c (diff) | |
download | linux-4120db47198d21d8cd3b2cdbbe1ea6118a50bcd4.tar.xz |
[PATCH] bugfix: two read_inode() calls without clear_inode() call between
Bug symptoms
~~~~~~~~~~~~
For the same inode VFS calls read_inode() twice and doesn't call
clear_inode() between the two read_inode() invocations.
Bug description
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Suppose we have an inode which has zero reference count but is still in
the inode cache. Suppose kswapd invokes shrink_icache_memory() to free
some RAM. In prune_icache() inodes are removed from i_hash. prune_icache
() is then going to call clear_inode(), but drops the inode_lock
spinlock before this. If in this moment another task calls iget() for an
inode which was just removed from i_hash by prune_icache(), then iget()
invokes read_inode() for this inode, because it is *already removed*
from i_hash.
The end result is: we call iget(#N) then iput(#N); inode #N has zero
i_count now and is in the inode cache; kswapd starts. kswapd removes the
inode #N from i_hash ans is preempted; we call iget(#N) again;
read_inode() is invoked as the result; but we expect clear_inode()
before.
Fix
~~~~~~~
To fix the bug I remove inodes from i_hash later, when clear_inode() is
actually called. I remove them from i_hash under spinlock protection.
Since the i_state is set to I_FREEING, it is safe to do this. The others
will sleep waiting for the inode state change.
I also postpone removing inodes from i_sb_list. It is not compulsory to
do so but I do it for readability reasons. Inodes are added/removed to
the lists together everywhere in the code and there is no point to
change this rule. This is harmless because the only user of i_sb_list
which somehow may interfere with me (invalidate_list()) is excluded by
the iprune_sem mutex.
The same race is possible in invalidate_list() so I do the same for it.
Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/inode.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/inode.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c index 0116d06731c2..5bc97507eeaa 100644 --- a/fs/inode.c +++ b/fs/inode.c @@ -282,6 +282,13 @@ static void dispose_list(struct list_head *head) if (inode->i_data.nrpages) truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0); clear_inode(inode); + + spin_lock(&inode_lock); + hlist_del_init(&inode->i_hash); + list_del_init(&inode->i_sb_list); + spin_unlock(&inode_lock); + + wake_up_inode(inode); destroy_inode(inode); nr_disposed++; } @@ -317,8 +324,6 @@ static int invalidate_list(struct list_head *head, struct list_head *dispose) inode = list_entry(tmp, struct inode, i_sb_list); invalidate_inode_buffers(inode); if (!atomic_read(&inode->i_count)) { - hlist_del_init(&inode->i_hash); - list_del(&inode->i_sb_list); list_move(&inode->i_list, dispose); inode->i_state |= I_FREEING; count++; @@ -439,8 +444,6 @@ static void prune_icache(int nr_to_scan) if (!can_unuse(inode)) continue; } - hlist_del_init(&inode->i_hash); - list_del_init(&inode->i_sb_list); list_move(&inode->i_list, &freeable); inode->i_state |= I_FREEING; nr_pruned++; |