diff options
author | Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> | 2020-03-09 18:57:22 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> | 2020-05-12 22:06:15 +0300 |
commit | 3c80d3794dac5b0f50132846113a120d881462ec (patch) | |
tree | 294161974355fa5be8697fd458132258eeda2b25 /fs/fs_struct.c | |
parent | a4e439a6f628a52f7074c9d73ec7eb4f6c1a4dfc (diff) | |
download | linux-3c80d3794dac5b0f50132846113a120d881462ec.tar.xz |
dlm: user: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/fs_struct.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions