diff options
| author | Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> | 2019-04-15 10:28:30 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> | 2019-05-09 07:23:07 +0300 |
| commit | 5e159cd349bf3a31fb7e35c23a93308eb30f4f71 (patch) | |
| tree | f480c0cc6f8d1d29d2b0d459d74cda4d2ae02081 /fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | |
| parent | 622927f3b8809206f6da54a6a7ed4df1a7770fce (diff) | |
| download | linux-5e159cd349bf3a31fb7e35c23a93308eb30f4f71.tar.xz | |
f2fs: fix to avoid panic in dec_valid_block_count()
As Jungyeon reported in bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203209
- Overview
When mounting the attached crafted image and running program, I got this error.
Additionally, it hangs on sync after the this script.
The image is intentionally fuzzed from a normal f2fs image for testing and I enabled option CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS on.
- Reproduces
cc poc_01.c
./run.sh f2fs
sync
kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:1788!
RIP: 0010:f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range+0x342/0x350
Call Trace:
f2fs_truncate_blocks+0x36d/0x3c0
f2fs_truncate+0x88/0x110
f2fs_setattr+0x3e1/0x460
notify_change+0x2da/0x400
do_truncate+0x6d/0xb0
do_sys_ftruncate+0xf1/0x160
do_syscall_64+0x43/0xf0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
The reason is dec_valid_block_count() will trigger kernel panic due to
inconsistent count in between inode.i_blocks and actual block.
To avoid panic, let's just print debug message and set SBI_NEED_FSCK to
give a hint to fsck for latter repairing.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
[Jaegeuk Kim: fix build warning and add unlikely]
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/f2fs/f2fs.h')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 12 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h index d5478f94cd25..3a1e621b451a 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h @@ -1789,6 +1789,7 @@ enospc: return -ENOSPC; } +void f2fs_msg(struct super_block *sb, const char *level, const char *fmt, ...); static inline void dec_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode, block_t count) @@ -1797,13 +1798,21 @@ static inline void dec_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock); f2fs_bug_on(sbi, sbi->total_valid_block_count < (block_t) count); - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, inode->i_blocks < sectors); sbi->total_valid_block_count -= (block_t)count; if (sbi->reserved_blocks && sbi->current_reserved_blocks < sbi->reserved_blocks) sbi->current_reserved_blocks = min(sbi->reserved_blocks, sbi->current_reserved_blocks + count); spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock); + if (unlikely(inode->i_blocks < sectors)) { + f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_WARNING, + "Inconsistent i_blocks, ino:%lu, iblocks:%llu, sectors:%llu", + inode->i_ino, + (unsigned long long)inode->i_blocks, + (unsigned long long)sectors); + set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK); + return; + } f2fs_i_blocks_write(inode, count, false, true); } @@ -2819,7 +2828,6 @@ static inline void f2fs_update_iostat(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int type); -void f2fs_msg(struct super_block *sb, const char *level, const char *fmt, ...); static inline void verify_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int type) { |