diff options
author | Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2008-07-12 03:27:31 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> | 2008-07-12 03:27:31 +0400 |
commit | 7061eba75ceb0835ba61e7cbd757a6f9c1e4af92 (patch) | |
tree | 9c70df3078c0543573a9f38bb60c6b0f54608c7a /fs/ext4/inode.c | |
parent | 6afd670713c9e7d5c5550e379dfedca8ffab4c90 (diff) | |
download | linux-7061eba75ceb0835ba61e7cbd757a6f9c1e4af92.tar.xz |
ext4: Use inode preallocation with -o noextents
When mballoc is enabled, block allocation for old block-based
files are allocated using mballoc allocator instead of old
block-based allocator. The old ext3 block reservation is turned
off when mballoc is turned on.
However, the in-core preallocation is not enabled for block-based/
non-extent based file block allocation. This result in performance
regression, as now we don't have "reservation" ore in-core preallocation
to prevent interleaved fragmentation in multiple writes workload.
This patch fix this by enable per inode in-core preallocation
for non extent files when mballoc is used.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/ext4/inode.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/ext4/inode.c | 72 |
1 files changed, 54 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index 7cce96a6935e..bc950562b5ba 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -508,11 +508,12 @@ static int ext4_blks_to_allocate(Indirect *branch, int k, unsigned long blks, * direct blocks */ static int ext4_alloc_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, - ext4_fsblk_t goal, int indirect_blks, int blks, - ext4_fsblk_t new_blocks[4], int *err) + ext4_lblk_t iblock, ext4_fsblk_t goal, + int indirect_blks, int blks, + ext4_fsblk_t new_blocks[4], int *err) { int target, i; - unsigned long count = 0; + unsigned long count = 0, blk_allocated = 0; int index = 0; ext4_fsblk_t current_block = 0; int ret = 0; @@ -525,12 +526,13 @@ static int ext4_alloc_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, * the first direct block of this branch. That's the * minimum number of blocks need to allocate(required) */ - target = blks + indirect_blks; - - while (1) { + /* first we try to allocate the indirect blocks */ + target = indirect_blks; + while (target > 0) { count = target; /* allocating blocks for indirect blocks and direct blocks */ - current_block = ext4_new_blocks(handle,inode,goal,&count,err); + current_block = ext4_new_meta_blocks(handle, inode, + goal, &count, err); if (*err) goto failed_out; @@ -540,16 +542,48 @@ static int ext4_alloc_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, new_blocks[index++] = current_block++; count--; } - - if (count > 0) + if (count > 0) { + /* + * save the new block number + * for the first direct block + */ + new_blocks[index] = current_block; + printk(KERN_INFO "%s returned more blocks than " + "requested\n", __func__); + WARN_ON(1); break; + } } - /* save the new block number for the first direct block */ - new_blocks[index] = current_block; - + target = blks - count ; + blk_allocated = count; + if (!target) + goto allocated; + /* Now allocate data blocks */ + count = target; + /* allocating blocks for indirect blocks and direct blocks */ + current_block = ext4_new_blocks(handle, inode, iblock, + goal, &count, err); + if (*err && (target == blks)) { + /* + * if the allocation failed and we didn't allocate + * any blocks before + */ + goto failed_out; + } + if (!*err) { + if (target == blks) { + /* + * save the new block number + * for the first direct block + */ + new_blocks[index] = current_block; + } + blk_allocated += count; + } +allocated: /* total number of blocks allocated for direct blocks */ - ret = count; + ret = blk_allocated; *err = 0; return ret; failed_out: @@ -584,8 +618,9 @@ failed_out: * as described above and return 0. */ static int ext4_alloc_branch(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, - int indirect_blks, int *blks, ext4_fsblk_t goal, - ext4_lblk_t *offsets, Indirect *branch) + ext4_lblk_t iblock, int indirect_blks, + int *blks, ext4_fsblk_t goal, + ext4_lblk_t *offsets, Indirect *branch) { int blocksize = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize; int i, n = 0; @@ -595,7 +630,7 @@ static int ext4_alloc_branch(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, ext4_fsblk_t new_blocks[4]; ext4_fsblk_t current_block; - num = ext4_alloc_blocks(handle, inode, goal, indirect_blks, + num = ext4_alloc_blocks(handle, inode, iblock, goal, indirect_blks, *blks, new_blocks, &err); if (err) return err; @@ -855,8 +890,9 @@ int ext4_get_blocks_handle(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, /* * Block out ext4_truncate while we alter the tree */ - err = ext4_alloc_branch(handle, inode, indirect_blks, &count, goal, - offsets + (partial - chain), partial); + err = ext4_alloc_branch(handle, inode, iblock, indirect_blks, + &count, goal, + offsets + (partial - chain), partial); /* * The ext4_splice_branch call will free and forget any buffers |