diff options
| author | Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> | 2010-02-23 22:43:04 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> | 2010-03-09 00:26:50 +0300 |
| commit | 6bef4d317193d3badbbfa3f3c593758ace84a629 (patch) | |
| tree | 8aa9fcf3297c69033b9a9a83a27ecccaab0f9d7d /fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h | |
| parent | 3f6fae9559225741c91f1320090b285da1413290 (diff) | |
| download | linux-6bef4d317193d3badbbfa3f3c593758ace84a629.tar.xz | |
Btrfs: use RB_ROOT to intialize rb_trees instead of setting rb_node to NULL
btrfs inialize rb trees in quite a number of places by settin rb_node =
NULL; The problem with this is that 17d9ddc72fb8bba0d4f678 in the
linux-next tree adds a new field to that struct which needs to be NULL for
the new rbtree library code to work properly. This patch uses RB_ROOT as
the intializer so all of the relevant fields will be NULL'd. Without the
patch I get a panic.
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h index 1fe1282ef47c..9116c6d0c5a9 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static inline void btrfs_ordered_inode_tree_init(struct btrfs_ordered_inode_tree *t) { mutex_init(&t->mutex); - t->tree.rb_node = NULL; + t->tree = RB_ROOT; t->last = NULL; } |