btrfs: handle csum lookup errors properly on reads

Currently any error we get while trying to lookup csums during reads
shows up as a missing csum, and then on the read completion side we
print an error saying there was a csum mismatch and we increase the
device corruption count.

However we could have gotten an EIO from the lookup.  We could also be
inside of a memory constrained container and gotten a ENOMEM while
trying to do the read.  In either case we don't want to make this look
like a file system corruption problem, we want to make it look like the
actual error it is.  Capture any negative value, convert it to the
appropriate blk_status_t, free the csum array if we have one and bail.

Note: a possible improvement would be to make the relocation code look
up the owning inode and see if it's marked as NODATASUM and set
EXTENT_NODATASUM there, that way if there's corruption and there isn't a
checksum when we want it we can fail here rather than later.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

1 files changed, 22 insertions, 14 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
index 1c6c621d1b0f..c828f971a346 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
@@ -368,6 +368,7 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio, u8 *dst
 {
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
 	struct extent_io_tree *io_tree = &BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree;
+	struct btrfs_bio *bbio = NULL;
 	struct btrfs_path *path;
 	const u32 sectorsize = fs_info->sectorsize;
 	const u32 csum_size = fs_info->csum_size;
@@ -377,6 +378,7 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio, u8 *dst
 	u8 *csum;
 	const unsigned int nblocks = orig_len >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
 	int count = 0;
+	blk_status_t ret = BLK_STS_OK;
 
 	if ((BTRFS_I(inode)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM) ||
 	    test_bit(BTRFS_FS_STATE_NO_CSUMS, &fs_info->fs_state))
@@ -400,7 +402,7 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio, u8 *dst
 		return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
 
 	if (!dst) {
-		struct btrfs_bio *bbio = btrfs_bio(bio);
+		bbio = btrfs_bio(bio);
 
 		if (nblocks * csum_size > BTRFS_BIO_INLINE_CSUM_SIZE) {
 			bbio->csum = kmalloc_array(nblocks, csum_size, GFP_NOFS);
@@ -456,21 +458,27 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio, u8 *dst
 
 		count = search_csum_tree(fs_info, path, cur_disk_bytenr,
 					 search_len, csum_dst);
-		if (count <= 0) {
-			/*
-			 * Either we hit a critical error or we didn't find
-			 * the csum.
-			 * Either way, we put zero into the csums dst, and skip
-			 * to the next sector.
-			 */
+		if (count < 0) {
+			ret = errno_to_blk_status(count);
+			if (bbio)
+				btrfs_bio_free_csum(bbio);
+			break;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * We didn't find a csum for this range.  We need to make sure
+		 * we complain loudly about this, because we are not NODATASUM.
+		 *
+		 * However for the DATA_RELOC inode we could potentially be
+		 * relocating data extents for a NODATASUM inode, so the inode
+		 * itself won't be marked with NODATASUM, but the extent we're
+		 * copying is in fact NODATASUM.  If we don't find a csum we
+		 * assume this is the case.
+		 */
+		if (count == 0) {
 			memset(csum_dst, 0, csum_size);
 			count = 1;
 
-			/*
-			 * For data reloc inode, we need to mark the range
-			 * NODATASUM so that balance won't report false csum
-			 * error.
-			 */
 			if (BTRFS_I(inode)->root->root_key.objectid ==
 			    BTRFS_DATA_RELOC_TREE_OBJECTID) {
 				u64 file_offset;
@@ -491,7 +499,7 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio, u8 *dst
 	}
 
 	btrfs_free_path(path);
-	return BLK_STS_OK;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 int btrfs_lookup_csums_range(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 start, u64 end,