summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>2022-09-16 10:28:35 +0300
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>2022-12-05 20:00:47 +0300
commitd52a1365258b5781c2635937afa91af66322d981 (patch)
treed96b6e0803a692ffcda61224e2e53effb8ee5185 /fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
parentaa5d3003ddee8d7c5c517db072f888e114ff1529 (diff)
downloadlinux-d52a1365258b5781c2635937afa91af66322d981.tar.xz
btrfs: selftests: remove impossible inline extent at non-zero file offset
In our inode-tests.c, we create an inline offset at file offset 5, which is no longer possible since the introduction of tree-checker. Thus I don't think we should spend time maintaining some corner cases which are already ruled out by tree-checker. So this patch will: - Change the inline extent to start at file offset 0 Also change its length to 6 to cover the original length - Add an extra ASSERT() for btrfs_add_extent_mapping() This is to make sure tree-checker is working correctly. - Update the inode selftest Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/extent_map.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/extent_map.c7
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
index cd45303f344d..4a4362f5cc52 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
@@ -638,6 +638,13 @@ int btrfs_add_extent_mapping(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
int ret;
struct extent_map *em = *em_in;
+ /*
+ * Tree-checker should have rejected any inline extent with non-zero
+ * file offset. Here just do a sanity check.
+ */
+ if (em->block_start == EXTENT_MAP_INLINE)
+ ASSERT(em->start == 0);
+
ret = add_extent_mapping(em_tree, em, 0);
/* it is possible that someone inserted the extent into the tree
* while we had the lock dropped. It is also possible that