diff options
author | Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> | 2011-12-22 00:59:45 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> | 2011-12-22 00:59:45 +0400 |
commit | b00f4dc5ff022cb9cbaffd376d9454d7fa1e496f (patch) | |
tree | 40f1b232e2f1e8ac365317a14fdcbcb331722b46 /fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | |
parent | 1eac8111e0763853266a171ce11214da3a347a0a (diff) | |
parent | b9e26dfdad5a4f9cbdaacafac6998614cc9c41bc (diff) | |
download | linux-b00f4dc5ff022cb9cbaffd376d9454d7fa1e496f.tar.xz |
Merge branch 'master' into pm-sleep
* master: (848 commits)
SELinux: Fix RCU deref check warning in sel_netport_insert()
binary_sysctl(): fix memory leak
mm/vmalloc.c: remove static declaration of va from __get_vm_area_node
ipmi_watchdog: restore settings when BMC reset
oom: fix integer overflow of points in oom_badness
memcg: keep root group unchanged if creation fails
nilfs2: potential integer overflow in nilfs_ioctl_clean_segments()
nilfs2: unbreak compat ioctl
cpusets: stall when updating mems_allowed for mempolicy or disjoint nodemask
evm: prevent racing during tfm allocation
evm: key must be set once during initialization
mmc: vub300: fix type of firmware_rom_wait_states module parameter
Revert "mmc: enable runtime PM by default"
mmc: sdhci: remove "state" argument from sdhci_suspend_host
x86, dumpstack: Fix code bytes breakage due to missing KERN_CONT
IB/qib: Correct sense on freectxts increment and decrement
RDMA/cma: Verify private data length
cgroups: fix a css_set not found bug in cgroup_attach_proc
oprofile: Fix uninitialized memory access when writing to writing to oprofilefs
Revert "xen/pv-on-hvm kexec: add xs_reset_watches to shutdown watches from old kernel"
...
Conflicts:
kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/async-thread.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 117 |
1 files changed, 55 insertions, 62 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c index 98ab240072e5..704a2ba08ea8 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c @@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ struct btrfs_worker_thread { int idle; }; +static int __btrfs_start_workers(struct btrfs_workers *workers); + /* * btrfs_start_workers uses kthread_run, which can block waiting for memory * for a very long time. It will actually throttle on page writeback, @@ -88,27 +90,10 @@ static void start_new_worker_func(struct btrfs_work *work) { struct worker_start *start; start = container_of(work, struct worker_start, work); - btrfs_start_workers(start->queue, 1); + __btrfs_start_workers(start->queue); kfree(start); } -static int start_new_worker(struct btrfs_workers *queue) -{ - struct worker_start *start; - int ret; - - start = kzalloc(sizeof(*start), GFP_NOFS); - if (!start) - return -ENOMEM; - - start->work.func = start_new_worker_func; - start->queue = queue; - ret = btrfs_queue_worker(queue->atomic_worker_start, &start->work); - if (ret) - kfree(start); - return ret; -} - /* * helper function to move a thread onto the idle list after it * has finished some requests. @@ -153,12 +138,20 @@ static void check_busy_worker(struct btrfs_worker_thread *worker) static void check_pending_worker_creates(struct btrfs_worker_thread *worker) { struct btrfs_workers *workers = worker->workers; + struct worker_start *start; unsigned long flags; rmb(); if (!workers->atomic_start_pending) return; + start = kzalloc(sizeof(*start), GFP_NOFS); + if (!start) + return; + + start->work.func = start_new_worker_func; + start->queue = workers; + spin_lock_irqsave(&workers->lock, flags); if (!workers->atomic_start_pending) goto out; @@ -170,10 +163,11 @@ static void check_pending_worker_creates(struct btrfs_worker_thread *worker) workers->num_workers_starting += 1; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workers->lock, flags); - start_new_worker(workers); + btrfs_queue_worker(workers->atomic_worker_start, &start->work); return; out: + kfree(start); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workers->lock, flags); } @@ -331,7 +325,7 @@ again: run_ordered_completions(worker->workers, work); check_pending_worker_creates(worker); - + cond_resched(); } spin_lock_irq(&worker->lock); @@ -462,56 +456,55 @@ void btrfs_init_workers(struct btrfs_workers *workers, char *name, int max, * starts new worker threads. This does not enforce the max worker * count in case you need to temporarily go past it. */ -static int __btrfs_start_workers(struct btrfs_workers *workers, - int num_workers) +static int __btrfs_start_workers(struct btrfs_workers *workers) { struct btrfs_worker_thread *worker; int ret = 0; - int i; - for (i = 0; i < num_workers; i++) { - worker = kzalloc(sizeof(*worker), GFP_NOFS); - if (!worker) { - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto fail; - } + worker = kzalloc(sizeof(*worker), GFP_NOFS); + if (!worker) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto fail; + } - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->pending); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->prio_pending); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->worker_list); - spin_lock_init(&worker->lock); - - atomic_set(&worker->num_pending, 0); - atomic_set(&worker->refs, 1); - worker->workers = workers; - worker->task = kthread_run(worker_loop, worker, - "btrfs-%s-%d", workers->name, - workers->num_workers + i); - if (IS_ERR(worker->task)) { - ret = PTR_ERR(worker->task); - kfree(worker); - goto fail; - } - spin_lock_irq(&workers->lock); - list_add_tail(&worker->worker_list, &workers->idle_list); - worker->idle = 1; - workers->num_workers++; - workers->num_workers_starting--; - WARN_ON(workers->num_workers_starting < 0); - spin_unlock_irq(&workers->lock); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->pending); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->prio_pending); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->worker_list); + spin_lock_init(&worker->lock); + + atomic_set(&worker->num_pending, 0); + atomic_set(&worker->refs, 1); + worker->workers = workers; + worker->task = kthread_run(worker_loop, worker, + "btrfs-%s-%d", workers->name, + workers->num_workers + 1); + if (IS_ERR(worker->task)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(worker->task); + kfree(worker); + goto fail; } + spin_lock_irq(&workers->lock); + list_add_tail(&worker->worker_list, &workers->idle_list); + worker->idle = 1; + workers->num_workers++; + workers->num_workers_starting--; + WARN_ON(workers->num_workers_starting < 0); + spin_unlock_irq(&workers->lock); + return 0; fail: - btrfs_stop_workers(workers); + spin_lock_irq(&workers->lock); + workers->num_workers_starting--; + spin_unlock_irq(&workers->lock); return ret; } -int btrfs_start_workers(struct btrfs_workers *workers, int num_workers) +int btrfs_start_workers(struct btrfs_workers *workers) { spin_lock_irq(&workers->lock); - workers->num_workers_starting += num_workers; + workers->num_workers_starting++; spin_unlock_irq(&workers->lock); - return __btrfs_start_workers(workers, num_workers); + return __btrfs_start_workers(workers); } /* @@ -568,6 +561,7 @@ static struct btrfs_worker_thread *find_worker(struct btrfs_workers *workers) struct btrfs_worker_thread *worker; unsigned long flags; struct list_head *fallback; + int ret; again: spin_lock_irqsave(&workers->lock, flags); @@ -584,7 +578,9 @@ again: workers->num_workers_starting++; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workers->lock, flags); /* we're below the limit, start another worker */ - __btrfs_start_workers(workers, 1); + ret = __btrfs_start_workers(workers); + if (ret) + goto fallback; goto again; } } @@ -665,7 +661,7 @@ void btrfs_set_work_high_prio(struct btrfs_work *work) /* * places a struct btrfs_work into the pending queue of one of the kthreads */ -int btrfs_queue_worker(struct btrfs_workers *workers, struct btrfs_work *work) +void btrfs_queue_worker(struct btrfs_workers *workers, struct btrfs_work *work) { struct btrfs_worker_thread *worker; unsigned long flags; @@ -673,7 +669,7 @@ int btrfs_queue_worker(struct btrfs_workers *workers, struct btrfs_work *work) /* don't requeue something already on a list */ if (test_and_set_bit(WORK_QUEUED_BIT, &work->flags)) - goto out; + return; worker = find_worker(workers); if (workers->ordered) { @@ -712,7 +708,4 @@ int btrfs_queue_worker(struct btrfs_workers *workers, struct btrfs_work *work) if (wake) wake_up_process(worker->task); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&worker->lock, flags); - -out: - return 0; } |