diff options
author | Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> | 2010-11-08 21:01:47 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> | 2010-11-10 02:02:02 +0300 |
commit | e045fec48970df84647a47930fcf7a22ff7229c0 (patch) | |
tree | 166eeaf241f594ab70f6cc4da80d3b194228f931 /drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c | |
parent | c9bd9d01db02319c33767da5ee310ea37afda059 (diff) | |
download | linux-e045fec48970df84647a47930fcf7a22ff7229c0.tar.xz |
tty: prevent DOS in the flush_to_ldisc
There's a small window inside the flush_to_ldisc function,
where the tty is unlocked and calling ldisc's receive_buf
function. If in this window new buffer is added to the tty,
the processing might never leave the flush_to_ldisc function.
This scenario will hog the cpu, causing other tty processing
starving, and making it impossible to interface the computer
via tty.
I was able to exploit this via pty interface by sending only
control characters to the master input, causing the flush_to_ldisc
to be scheduled, but never actually generate any output.
To reproduce, please run multiple instances of following code.
- SNIP
#define _XOPEN_SOURCE
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int i, slave, master = getpt();
char buf[8192];
sprintf(buf, "%s", ptsname(master));
grantpt(master);
unlockpt(master);
slave = open(buf, O_RDWR);
if (slave < 0) {
perror("open slave failed");
return 1;
}
for(i = 0; i < sizeof(buf); i++)
buf[i] = rand() % 32;
while(1) {
write(master, buf, sizeof(buf));
}
return 0;
}
- SNIP
The attached patch (based on -next tree) fixes this by checking on the
tty buffer tail. Once it's reached, the current work is rescheduled
and another could run.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c index cc1e9850d655..d8210ca00720 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c @@ -413,7 +413,8 @@ static void flush_to_ldisc(struct work_struct *work) spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->buf.lock, flags); if (!test_and_set_bit(TTY_FLUSHING, &tty->flags)) { - struct tty_buffer *head; + struct tty_buffer *head, *tail = tty->buf.tail; + int seen_tail = 0; while ((head = tty->buf.head) != NULL) { int count; char *char_buf; @@ -423,6 +424,15 @@ static void flush_to_ldisc(struct work_struct *work) if (!count) { if (head->next == NULL) break; + /* + There's a possibility tty might get new buffer + added during the unlock window below. We could + end up spinning in here forever hogging the CPU + completely. To avoid this let's have a rest each + time we processed the tail buffer. + */ + if (tail == head) + seen_tail = 1; tty->buf.head = head->next; tty_buffer_free(tty, head); continue; @@ -432,7 +442,7 @@ static void flush_to_ldisc(struct work_struct *work) line discipline as we want to empty the queue */ if (test_bit(TTY_FLUSHPENDING, &tty->flags)) break; - if (!tty->receive_room) { + if (!tty->receive_room || seen_tail) { schedule_delayed_work(&tty->buf.work, 1); break; } |