diff options
author | Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi> | 2011-03-31 05:57:33 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi> | 2011-03-31 18:26:23 +0400 |
commit | 25985edcedea6396277003854657b5f3cb31a628 (patch) | |
tree | f026e810210a2ee7290caeb737c23cb6472b7c38 /drivers/scsi/aha1740.c | |
parent | 6aba74f2791287ec407e0f92487a725a25908067 (diff) | |
download | linux-25985edcedea6396277003854657b5f3cb31a628.tar.xz |
Fix common misspellings
Fixes generated by 'codespell' and manually reviewed.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/scsi/aha1740.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/scsi/aha1740.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/aha1740.c b/drivers/scsi/aha1740.c index d058f1ab82b5..1c10b796c1a2 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/aha1740.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/aha1740.c @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ static int aha1740_queuecommand_lck(Scsi_Cmnd * SCpnt, void (*done)(Scsi_Cmnd *) /* The Adaptec Spec says the card is so fast that the loops will only be executed once in the code below. Even if this was true with the fastest processors when the spec was - written, it doesn't seem to be true with todays fast + written, it doesn't seem to be true with today's fast processors. We print a warning if the code is executed more often than LOOPCNT_WARN. If this happens, it should be investigated. If the count reaches LOOPCNT_MAX, we assume |