summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>2009-08-28 20:44:48 +0400
committerJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>2009-08-31 22:42:10 +0400
commit4c561a02291326c50f9b1f647eae891af9d1f3b2 (patch)
tree6953c5d26d45745aa27824208b902891e91c6322 /drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi
parent31513be8a06874eb359908b7b735929837831a9a (diff)
downloadlinux-4c561a02291326c50f9b1f647eae891af9d1f3b2.tar.xz
iwlwifi: use sleep interval succession
Some concerns were raised about the automatic adjustment of sleep intervals to all the same, potentially high, value, and I can imagine the hardware behaving better when we don't ask too much of it. So let's convert to use a succession of sleep levels when requesting to go to deeper sleeps (which can only happen with large DTIM intervals), using the succession values from power level three, which have the benefit of also having been tested extensively already. As a result, the automatic sleep level adjustment will now be mostly equivalent to power level three, except for the RX/TX timeouts and possibly using smaller sleep vectors to account for networking latency. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi')
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-power.c22
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-power.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-power.c
index 0b16841f45f4..081a7ea40c6c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-power.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-power.c
@@ -216,8 +216,27 @@ static void iwl_power_fill_sleep_cmd(struct iwl_priv *priv,
struct iwl_powertable_cmd *cmd,
int dynps_ms, int wakeup_period)
{
+ /*
+ * These are the original power level 3 sleep successions. The
+ * device may behave better with such succession and was also
+ * only tested with that. Just like the original sleep commands,
+ * also adjust the succession here to the wakeup_period below.
+ * The ranges are the same as for the sleep commands, 0-2, 3-9
+ * and >10, which is selected based on the DTIM interval for
+ * the sleep index but here we use the wakeup period since that
+ * is what we need to do for the latency requirements.
+ */
+ static const u8 slp_succ_r0[IWL_POWER_VEC_SIZE] = { 2, 2, 2, 2, 2 };
+ static const u8 slp_succ_r1[IWL_POWER_VEC_SIZE] = { 2, 4, 6, 7, 9 };
+ static const u8 slp_succ_r2[IWL_POWER_VEC_SIZE] = { 2, 7, 9, 9, 0xFF };
+ const u8 *slp_succ = slp_succ_r0;
int i;
+ if (wakeup_period > IWL_DTIM_RANGE_0_MAX)
+ slp_succ = slp_succ_r1;
+ if (wakeup_period > IWL_DTIM_RANGE_1_MAX)
+ slp_succ = slp_succ_r2;
+
memset(cmd, 0, sizeof(*cmd));
cmd->flags = IWL_POWER_DRIVER_ALLOW_SLEEP_MSK |
@@ -230,7 +249,8 @@ static void iwl_power_fill_sleep_cmd(struct iwl_priv *priv,
cmd->tx_data_timeout = cpu_to_le32(1000 * dynps_ms);
for (i = 0; i < IWL_POWER_VEC_SIZE; i++)
- cmd->sleep_interval[i] = cpu_to_le32(wakeup_period);
+ cmd->sleep_interval[i] =
+ cpu_to_le32(min_t(int, slp_succ[i], wakeup_period));
IWL_DEBUG_POWER(priv, "Automatic sleep command\n");
}