summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>2009-07-24 22:13:00 +0400
committerJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>2009-07-27 23:24:20 +0400
commite3139fe741b25a0f8a27fd2cdf2ad11734c3d4d3 (patch)
tree6691e85878072f6f4dd88a3457c30ededfdf39a0 /drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi
parent21f5fc75deca63bc41c9d13007d35981d4485622 (diff)
downloadlinux-e3139fe741b25a0f8a27fd2cdf2ad11734c3d4d3.tar.xz
iwlwifi: revert to active table when rate is not valid
When performing rate scaling, if detected that the new rate index is invalid, clear the search_better_tbl flag so it will not be stuck in the loop. Since the search table is already set up in uCode, we need to empty out the the search table; revert back to the "active" rate and throughput info. Also pass the "active" table setup to uCode to make sure the rate scale is functioning correctly. Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi')
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c37
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c
index 63280411fd58..40207dac6db5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c
@@ -2003,6 +2003,25 @@ static void rs_stay_in_table(struct iwl_lq_sta *lq_sta)
}
/*
+ * setup rate table in uCode
+ * return rate_n_flags as used in the table
+ */
+static u32 rs_update_rate_tbl(struct iwl_priv *priv,
+ struct iwl_lq_sta *lq_sta,
+ struct iwl_scale_tbl_info *tbl,
+ int index, u8 is_green)
+{
+ u32 rate;
+
+ /* Update uCode's rate table. */
+ rate = rate_n_flags_from_tbl(priv, tbl, index, is_green);
+ rs_fill_link_cmd(priv, lq_sta, rate);
+ iwl_send_lq_cmd(priv, &lq_sta->lq, CMD_ASYNC);
+
+ return rate;
+}
+
+/*
* Do rate scaling and search for new modulation mode.
*/
static void rs_rate_scale_perform(struct iwl_priv *priv,
@@ -2098,6 +2117,16 @@ static void rs_rate_scale_perform(struct iwl_priv *priv,
if (!((1 << index) & rate_scale_index_msk)) {
IWL_ERR(priv, "Current Rate is not valid\n");
+ if (lq_sta->search_better_tbl) {
+ /* revert to active table if search table is not valid*/
+ tbl->lq_type = LQ_NONE;
+ lq_sta->search_better_tbl = 0;
+ tbl = &(lq_sta->lq_info[lq_sta->active_tbl]);
+ /* get "active" rate info */
+ index = iwl_hwrate_to_plcp_idx(tbl->current_rate);
+ rate = rs_update_rate_tbl(priv, lq_sta,
+ tbl, index, is_green);
+ }
return;
}
@@ -2308,11 +2337,9 @@ static void rs_rate_scale_perform(struct iwl_priv *priv,
lq_update:
/* Replace uCode's rate table for the destination station. */
- if (update_lq) {
- rate = rate_n_flags_from_tbl(priv, tbl, index, is_green);
- rs_fill_link_cmd(priv, lq_sta, rate);
- iwl_send_lq_cmd(priv, &lq_sta->lq, CMD_ASYNC);
- }
+ if (update_lq)
+ rate = rs_update_rate_tbl(priv, lq_sta,
+ tbl, index, is_green);
/* Should we stay with this modulation mode, or search for a new one? */
rs_stay_in_table(lq_sta);