diff options
| author | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> | 2019-06-07 22:20:36 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2019-06-10 05:40:09 +0300 |
| commit | f9dae5554aed4d55ab82a344f9fa698423ffac95 (patch) | |
| tree | 7890f1052e927b4be577ee80967192100d15cd3e /drivers/net/ethernet/freescale | |
| parent | 92dcabd7a0ea0fd88d414f39092132f848652772 (diff) | |
| download | linux-f9dae5554aed4d55ab82a344f9fa698423ffac95.tar.xz | |
dpaa2-eth: Remove preempt_disable() from seed_pool()
According to the comment, the preempt_disable() statement is required
due to synchronisation in napi_alloc_frag(). The awful truth is that
local_bh_disable() is required because otherwise the NAPI poll callback
can be invoked while the open function setup buffers. This isn't
unlikely since the dpaa2 provides multiple devices.
The usage of napi_alloc_frag() has been removed in commit
27c874867c4e9 ("dpaa2-eth: Use a single page per Rx buffer")
which means that the comment is not accurate and the preempt_disable()
statement is not required.
Remove the outdated comment and the no longer required
preempt_disable().
Cc: Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/ethernet/freescale')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-eth.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-eth.c index 753957ec72be..27ecd06a63b7 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-eth.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-eth.c @@ -997,13 +997,6 @@ static int seed_pool(struct dpaa2_eth_priv *priv, u16 bpid) int i, j; int new_count; - /* This is the lazy seeding of Rx buffer pools. - * dpaa2_add_bufs() is also used on the Rx hotpath and calls - * napi_alloc_frag(). The trouble with that is that it in turn ends up - * calling this_cpu_ptr(), which mandates execution in atomic context. - * Rather than splitting up the code, do a one-off preempt disable. - */ - preempt_disable(); for (j = 0; j < priv->num_channels; j++) { for (i = 0; i < DPAA2_ETH_NUM_BUFS; i += DPAA2_ETH_BUFS_PER_CMD) { @@ -1011,12 +1004,10 @@ static int seed_pool(struct dpaa2_eth_priv *priv, u16 bpid) priv->channel[j]->buf_count += new_count; if (new_count < DPAA2_ETH_BUFS_PER_CMD) { - preempt_enable(); return -ENOMEM; } } } - preempt_enable(); return 0; } |