summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoel Reardon <joel@clambassador.com>2012-05-18 17:40:24 +0400
committerArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>2012-05-21 12:34:41 +0400
commitd36e59e69b8be536c55d6118630f0221cee5ccee (patch)
tree8ffa8feec4ddbfeca391278c449c5ba1b3e78d2e /drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c
parent6dd3bc7e6032ffb392477fadca77172c1c9e346b (diff)
downloadlinux-d36e59e69b8be536c55d6118630f0221cee5ccee.tar.xz
UBI: add lnum and vol_id to struct ubi_work
This is part of a multipart patch to allow UBI to force the erasure of particular logical eraseblock numbers. In this patch, the volume id and LEB number are added to ubi_work data structure, and both are also passed as a parameter to schedule erase to set it appropriately. Whenever ubi_wl_put_peb is called, the lnum is also passed to be forwarded to schedule erase. Later, a new ubi_sync_lnum will be added to execute immediately all work related to that lnum. This was tested by outputting the vol_id and lnum during the schedule of erasure. The ubi thread was disabled and two ubifs drives on separate partitions repeated changed a small number of LEBs. The ubi module was readded, and all the erased LEBs, corresponding to the volumes, were added to the schedule erase queue. Artem: minor tweaks Signed-off-by: Joel Reardon <reardonj@inf.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c16
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c
index 5fa726f9c1fc..b703ac7729cf 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ int ubi_eba_unmap_leb(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_volume *vol,
dbg_eba("erase LEB %d:%d, PEB %d", vol_id, lnum, pnum);
vol->eba_tbl[lnum] = UBI_LEB_UNMAPPED;
- err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, pnum, 0);
+ err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, vol_id, lnum, pnum, 0);
out_unlock:
leb_write_unlock(ubi, vol_id, lnum);
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ retry:
ubi_free_vid_hdr(ubi, vid_hdr);
vol->eba_tbl[lnum] = new_pnum;
- ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, pnum, 1);
+ ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, vol_id, lnum, pnum, 1);
ubi_msg("data was successfully recovered");
return 0;
@@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ retry:
out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&ubi->buf_mutex);
out_put:
- ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, new_pnum, 1);
+ ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, vol_id, lnum, new_pnum, 1);
ubi_free_vid_hdr(ubi, vid_hdr);
return err;
@@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ write_error:
* get another one.
*/
ubi_warn("failed to write to PEB %d", new_pnum);
- ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, new_pnum, 1);
+ ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, vol_id, lnum, new_pnum, 1);
if (++tries > UBI_IO_RETRIES) {
ubi_free_vid_hdr(ubi, vid_hdr);
return err;
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ write_error:
* eraseblock, so just put it and request a new one. We assume that if
* this physical eraseblock went bad, the erase code will handle that.
*/
- err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, pnum, 1);
+ err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, vol_id, lnum, pnum, 1);
if (err || ++tries > UBI_IO_RETRIES) {
ubi_ro_mode(ubi);
leb_write_unlock(ubi, vol_id, lnum);
@@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ write_error:
return err;
}
- err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, pnum, 1);
+ err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, vol_id, lnum, pnum, 1);
if (err || ++tries > UBI_IO_RETRIES) {
ubi_ro_mode(ubi);
leb_write_unlock(ubi, vol_id, lnum);
@@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ retry:
}
if (vol->eba_tbl[lnum] >= 0) {
- err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, vol->eba_tbl[lnum], 0);
+ err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, vol_id, lnum, vol->eba_tbl[lnum], 0);
if (err)
goto out_leb_unlock;
}
@@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ write_error:
goto out_leb_unlock;
}
- err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, pnum, 1);
+ err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, vol_id, lnum, pnum, 1);
if (err || ++tries > UBI_IO_RETRIES) {
ubi_ro_mode(ubi);
goto out_leb_unlock;