diff options
| author | Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> | 2013-05-02 16:02:39 +0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> | 2013-05-26 22:23:17 +0400 |
| commit | c4d770d72492df510077b277f21ac5f0dad9e5eb (patch) | |
| tree | 60412abaad7c69267483d368afeff4d0a769a82b /drivers/mmc/core/sd.c | |
| parent | e94cfef698aae6b209d8918dd319312e4b02118d (diff) | |
| download | linux-c4d770d72492df510077b277f21ac5f0dad9e5eb.tar.xz | |
mmc: core: Support aggressive power management for (e)MMC/SD
Aggressive power management is suitable when saving power is
essential. At request inactivity timeout, aka pm runtime
autosuspend timeout, the card will be suspended.
Once a new request arrives, the card will be re-initalized and
thus the first request will suffer from a latency. This latency
is card-specific, experiments has shown in general that SD-cards
has quite poor initialization time, around 300ms-1100ms. eMMC is
not surprisingly far better but still a couple of hundreds of ms
has been observed.
Except for the request latency, it is important to know that
suspending the card will also prevent the card from executing
internal house-keeping operations in idle mode. This could mean
degradation in performance.
To use this feature make sure the request inactivity timeout is
chosen carefully. This has not been done as a part of this patch.
Enable this feature by using host cap MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM and
by setting CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/mmc/core/sd.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/mmc/core/sd.c | 49 |
1 files changed, 49 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c index 17fa2d271dd4..aeaae7c3b22b 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c @@ -1100,6 +1100,53 @@ static int mmc_sd_resume(struct mmc_host *host) return err; } +/* + * Callback for runtime_suspend. + */ +static int mmc_sd_runtime_suspend(struct mmc_host *host) +{ + int err; + + if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM)) + return 0; + + mmc_claim_host(host); + + err = mmc_sd_suspend(host); + if (err) { + pr_err("%s: error %d doing aggessive suspend\n", + mmc_hostname(host), err); + goto out; + } + mmc_power_off(host); + +out: + mmc_release_host(host); + return err; +} + +/* + * Callback for runtime_resume. + */ +static int mmc_sd_runtime_resume(struct mmc_host *host) +{ + int err; + + if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM)) + return 0; + + mmc_claim_host(host); + + mmc_power_up(host); + err = mmc_sd_resume(host); + if (err) + pr_err("%s: error %d doing aggessive resume\n", + mmc_hostname(host), err); + + mmc_release_host(host); + return 0; +} + static int mmc_sd_power_restore(struct mmc_host *host) { int ret; @@ -1124,6 +1171,8 @@ static const struct mmc_bus_ops mmc_sd_ops = { static const struct mmc_bus_ops mmc_sd_ops_unsafe = { .remove = mmc_sd_remove, .detect = mmc_sd_detect, + .runtime_suspend = mmc_sd_runtime_suspend, + .runtime_resume = mmc_sd_runtime_resume, .suspend = mmc_sd_suspend, .resume = mmc_sd_resume, .power_restore = mmc_sd_power_restore, |