Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next-queued

Some DSI and VBT pending patches from Hans will apply
cleanly and with less ugly conflicts if they are rebuilt
on top of other patches that recently landed on drm-next.

Reference: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/70952/
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com

1 files changed, 28 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index d6218012097b..c1f7af9d9ae7 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -858,8 +858,21 @@ static int __gic_update_rdist_properties(struct redist_region *region,
 					 void __iomem *ptr)
 {
 	u64 typer = gic_read_typer(ptr + GICR_TYPER);
+
 	gic_data.rdists.has_vlpis &= !!(typer & GICR_TYPER_VLPIS);
-	gic_data.rdists.has_direct_lpi &= !!(typer & GICR_TYPER_DirectLPIS);
+
+	/* RVPEID implies some form of DirectLPI, no matter what the doc says... :-/ */
+	gic_data.rdists.has_rvpeid &= !!(typer & GICR_TYPER_RVPEID);
+	gic_data.rdists.has_direct_lpi &= (!!(typer & GICR_TYPER_DirectLPIS) |
+					   gic_data.rdists.has_rvpeid);
+
+	/* Detect non-sensical configurations */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(gic_data.rdists.has_rvpeid && !gic_data.rdists.has_vlpis)) {
+		gic_data.rdists.has_direct_lpi = false;
+		gic_data.rdists.has_vlpis = false;
+		gic_data.rdists.has_rvpeid = false;
+	}
+
 	gic_data.ppi_nr = min(GICR_TYPER_NR_PPIS(typer), gic_data.ppi_nr);
 
 	return 1;
@@ -872,9 +885,10 @@ static void gic_update_rdist_properties(void)
 	if (WARN_ON(gic_data.ppi_nr == UINT_MAX))
 		gic_data.ppi_nr = 0;
 	pr_info("%d PPIs implemented\n", gic_data.ppi_nr);
-	pr_info("%sVLPI support, %sdirect LPI support\n",
+	pr_info("%sVLPI support, %sdirect LPI support, %sRVPEID support\n",
 		!gic_data.rdists.has_vlpis ? "no " : "",
-		!gic_data.rdists.has_direct_lpi ? "no " : "");
+		!gic_data.rdists.has_direct_lpi ? "no " : "",
+		!gic_data.rdists.has_rvpeid ? "no " : "");
 }
 
 /* Check whether it's single security state view */
@@ -1562,10 +1576,14 @@ static int __init gic_init_bases(void __iomem *dist_base,
 
 	pr_info("%d SPIs implemented\n", GIC_LINE_NR - 32);
 	pr_info("%d Extended SPIs implemented\n", GIC_ESPI_NR);
+
+	gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer2 = readl_relaxed(gic_data.dist_base + GICD_TYPER2);
+
 	gic_data.domain = irq_domain_create_tree(handle, &gic_irq_domain_ops,
 						 &gic_data);
 	irq_domain_update_bus_token(gic_data.domain, DOMAIN_BUS_WIRED);
 	gic_data.rdists.rdist = alloc_percpu(typeof(*gic_data.rdists.rdist));
+	gic_data.rdists.has_rvpeid = true;
 	gic_data.rdists.has_vlpis = true;
 	gic_data.rdists.has_direct_lpi = true;
 
@@ -1821,6 +1839,7 @@ static struct
 	struct redist_region *redist_regs;
 	u32 nr_redist_regions;
 	bool single_redist;
+	int enabled_rdists;
 	u32 maint_irq;
 	int maint_irq_mode;
 	phys_addr_t vcpu_base;
@@ -1915,8 +1934,10 @@ static int __init gic_acpi_match_gicc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
 	 * If GICC is enabled and has valid gicr base address, then it means
 	 * GICR base is presented via GICC
 	 */
-	if ((gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) && gicc->gicr_base_address)
+	if ((gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) && gicc->gicr_base_address) {
+		acpi_data.enabled_rdists++;
 		return 0;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * It's perfectly valid firmware can pass disabled GICC entry, driver
@@ -1946,8 +1967,10 @@ static int __init gic_acpi_count_gicr_regions(void)
 
 	count = acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_INTERRUPT,
 				      gic_acpi_match_gicc, 0);
-	if (count > 0)
+	if (count > 0) {
 		acpi_data.single_redist = true;
+		count = acpi_data.enabled_rdists;
+	}
 
 	return count;
 }