diff options
| author | Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> | 2020-05-25 14:38:53 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> | 2020-06-20 19:34:44 +0300 |
| commit | f11d59d87b8622d4cf9f856c0b8029fb030d8612 (patch) | |
| tree | 249450dfe73731ab943e918cd5ed5ddd6c66c28b /drivers/iio/industrialio-trigger.c | |
| parent | 044d406a8490ea6a4e1a06ccb94090c8a0951d3c (diff) | |
| download | linux-f11d59d87b8622d4cf9f856c0b8029fb030d8612.tar.xz | |
iio: Move attach/detach of the poll func to the core
All devices using a triggered buffer need to attach and detach the trigger
to the device in order to properly work. Instead of doing this in each and
every driver by hand move this into the core.
At this point in time, all drivers should have been resolved to
attach/detach the poll-function in the same order.
This patch removes all explicit calls of iio_triggered_buffer_postenable()
& iio_triggered_buffer_predisable() in all drivers, since the core handles
now the pollfunc attach/detach.
The more peculiar change is for the 'at91-sama5d2_adc' driver, since it's
not immediately obvious that removing the hooks doesn't break anything.
Eugen was able to test on at91-sama5d2-adc driver, sama5d2-xplained board.
All seems to be fine.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Tested-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com> #for at91-sama5d2-adc
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/iio/industrialio-trigger.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/iio/industrialio-trigger.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-trigger.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-trigger.c index 53d1931f6be8..6f16357fd732 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-trigger.c +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-trigger.c @@ -239,8 +239,8 @@ static void iio_trigger_put_irq(struct iio_trigger *trig, int irq) * the relevant function is in there may be the best option. */ /* Worth protecting against double additions? */ -static int iio_trigger_attach_poll_func(struct iio_trigger *trig, - struct iio_poll_func *pf) +int iio_trigger_attach_poll_func(struct iio_trigger *trig, + struct iio_poll_func *pf) { int ret = 0; bool notinuse @@ -290,8 +290,8 @@ out_put_module: return ret; } -static int iio_trigger_detach_poll_func(struct iio_trigger *trig, - struct iio_poll_func *pf) +int iio_trigger_detach_poll_func(struct iio_trigger *trig, + struct iio_poll_func *pf) { int ret = 0; bool no_other_users @@ -705,17 +705,3 @@ void iio_device_unregister_trigger_consumer(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) if (indio_dev->trig) iio_trigger_put(indio_dev->trig); } - -int iio_triggered_buffer_postenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) -{ - return iio_trigger_attach_poll_func(indio_dev->trig, - indio_dev->pollfunc); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL(iio_triggered_buffer_postenable); - -int iio_triggered_buffer_predisable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) -{ - return iio_trigger_detach_poll_func(indio_dev->trig, - indio_dev->pollfunc); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL(iio_triggered_buffer_predisable); |