diff options
author | Tarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com> | 2018-07-12 08:33:23 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> | 2018-07-13 05:30:30 +0300 |
commit | c3d433617d2048f5fc3ee1135bce1a9bc2375662 (patch) | |
tree | e87cc3b0cc878acf75a06a1ce855dae94c396a4d /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | |
parent | d5dc0f43f268bf2b6bb61f109a18a652a49c6f4e (diff) | |
download | linux-c3d433617d2048f5fc3ee1135bce1a9bc2375662.tar.xz |
drm/i915: Use crtc_state->has_psr instead of CAN_PSR for pipe update
In commit "drm/i915: Wait for PSR exit before checking for vblank
evasion", the idea was to limit the PSR IDLE checks when PSR is
actually supported. While CAN_PSR does do that check, it doesn't
applies on a per-crtc basis. crtc_state->has_psr is a more granular
check that only applies to pipe(s) that have PSR enabled.
Without the has_psr check, we end up waiting on the eDP transcoder's
PSR_STATUS register irrespective of whether the pipe being updated is
driving it or not.
v2: Remove unnecessary parantheses, make checkpatch happy.
v3: Move the has_psr check to intel_psr_wait_for_idle and commit
message changes (DK).
v4: Derive dev_priv from intel_crtc_state (DK)
v5: Commit message changes to reflect the HW behavior (DK)
Fixes: a608987970b9 ("drm/i915: Wait for PSR exit before checking for vblank evasion")
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180712053323.26266-1-tarun.vyas@intel.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c index 23acc9ac8d4d..e97db5dd75b1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c @@ -717,11 +717,16 @@ void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, cancel_work_sync(&dev_priv->psr.work); } -int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) +int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state) { + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(new_crtc_state->base.crtc); + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev); i915_reg_t reg; u32 mask; + if (!new_crtc_state->has_psr) + return 0; + /* * The sole user right now is intel_pipe_update_start(), * which won't race with psr_enable/disable, which is |