summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>2014-05-21 15:42:56 +0400
committerJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>2014-05-27 12:18:39 +0400
commit00731155a73020c8e3c215723be193f96b4fcb1f (patch)
tree060e3c328508e9e091e439f6895c01ff394481a1 /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
parentc7208164e66f63e3ec1759b98087849286410741 (diff)
downloadlinux-00731155a73020c8e3c215723be193f96b4fcb1f.tar.xz
drm/i915: Fix dynamic allocation of physical handles
A single object may be referenced by multiple registers fundamentally breaking the static allotment of ids in the current design. When the object is used the second time, the physical address of the first assignment is relinquished and a second one granted. However, the hardware is still reading (and possibly writing) to the old physical address now returned to the system. Eventually hilarity will ensue, but in the short term, it just means that cursors are broken when using more than one pipe. v2: Fix up leak of pci handle when handling an error during attachment, and avoid a double kmap/kunmap. (Ville) Rebase against -fixes. v3: And fix the error handling added in v2 (Ville) Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77351 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c12
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
index d8adc9104dca..129db0c7d835 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ intel_overlay_map_regs(struct intel_overlay *overlay)
struct overlay_registers __iomem *regs;
if (OVERLAY_NEEDS_PHYSICAL(overlay->dev))
- regs = (struct overlay_registers __iomem *)overlay->reg_bo->phys_obj->handle->vaddr;
+ regs = (struct overlay_registers __iomem *)overlay->reg_bo->phys_handle->vaddr;
else
regs = io_mapping_map_wc(dev_priv->gtt.mappable,
i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(overlay->reg_bo));
@@ -1340,14 +1340,12 @@ void intel_setup_overlay(struct drm_device *dev)
overlay->reg_bo = reg_bo;
if (OVERLAY_NEEDS_PHYSICAL(dev)) {
- ret = i915_gem_attach_phys_object(dev, reg_bo,
- I915_GEM_PHYS_OVERLAY_REGS,
- PAGE_SIZE);
+ ret = i915_gem_object_attach_phys(reg_bo, PAGE_SIZE);
if (ret) {
DRM_ERROR("failed to attach phys overlay regs\n");
goto out_free_bo;
}
- overlay->flip_addr = reg_bo->phys_obj->handle->busaddr;
+ overlay->flip_addr = reg_bo->phys_handle->busaddr;
} else {
ret = i915_gem_obj_ggtt_pin(reg_bo, PAGE_SIZE, PIN_MAPPABLE);
if (ret) {
@@ -1428,7 +1426,7 @@ intel_overlay_map_regs_atomic(struct intel_overlay *overlay)
/* Cast to make sparse happy, but it's wc memory anyway, so
* equivalent to the wc io mapping on X86. */
regs = (struct overlay_registers __iomem *)
- overlay->reg_bo->phys_obj->handle->vaddr;
+ overlay->reg_bo->phys_handle->vaddr;
else
regs = io_mapping_map_atomic_wc(dev_priv->gtt.mappable,
i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(overlay->reg_bo));
@@ -1462,7 +1460,7 @@ intel_overlay_capture_error_state(struct drm_device *dev)
error->dovsta = I915_READ(DOVSTA);
error->isr = I915_READ(ISR);
if (OVERLAY_NEEDS_PHYSICAL(overlay->dev))
- error->base = (__force long)overlay->reg_bo->phys_obj->handle->vaddr;
+ error->base = (__force long)overlay->reg_bo->phys_handle->vaddr;
else
error->base = i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(overlay->reg_bo);