summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>2018-10-26 03:56:36 +0300
committerRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>2018-10-29 20:44:16 +0300
commit42882336e62aab00278114392a16374f272a0c99 (patch)
treeb76874df914d0b32009d56ef21d09462c7da93e5 /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
parent5bc0e89ff1bee1566bd2fbd1142dce001c068aeb (diff)
downloadlinux-42882336e62aab00278114392a16374f272a0c99.tar.xz
drm/i915/glk: Remove 99% limitation.
While checking the opportunity to add a display_gen check to allow glk and cnl to be on same bucket I noticed these FIXME cases here. So I got the confirmation from HW architect that we actually never needed this workaround. "GLK supports 2 pixel per clock, so pixel clock can be up to 2 * cdclk." So, this reverts commit 97f55ca5b662 ("drm/i915/glk: limit pixel clock to 99% of cdclk workaround") Fixes: 97f55ca5b662 ("drm/i915/glk: limit pixel clock to 99% of cdclk workaround") Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Madhav Chauhan <madhav.chauhan@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Clinton Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com> Cc: Arthur J Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181026005636.22274-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c18
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
index 29075c763428..8d74276029e6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -2138,16 +2138,8 @@ void intel_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
static int intel_pixel_rate_to_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
int pixel_rate)
{
- if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
+ if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
return DIV_ROUND_UP(pixel_rate, 2);
- else if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
- /*
- * FIXME: Avoid using a pixel clock that is more than 99% of the cdclk
- * as a temporary workaround. Use a higher cdclk instead. (Note that
- * intel_compute_max_dotclk() limits the max pixel clock to 99% of max
- * cdclk.)
- */
- return DIV_ROUND_UP(pixel_rate * 100, 2 * 99);
else if (IS_GEN9(dev_priv) ||
IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv) || IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
return pixel_rate;
@@ -2543,14 +2535,8 @@ static int intel_compute_max_dotclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
int max_cdclk_freq = dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq;
- if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
+ if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
return 2 * max_cdclk_freq;
- else if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
- /*
- * FIXME: Limiting to 99% as a temporary workaround. See
- * intel_min_cdclk() for details.
- */
- return 2 * max_cdclk_freq * 99 / 100;
else if (IS_GEN9(dev_priv) ||
IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv) || IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
return max_cdclk_freq;