drm/i915: Look for an active kernel context before switching

We were not very carefully checking to see if an older request on the
engine was an earlier switch-to-kernel-context before deciding to emit a
new switch. The end result would be that we could get into a permanent
loop of trying to emit a new request to perform the switch simply to
flush the existing switch.

What we need is a means of tracking the completion of each timeline
versus the kernel context, that is to detect if a more recent request
has been submitted that would result in a switch away from the kernel
context. To realise this, we need only to look in our syncmap on the
kernel context and check that we have synchronized against all active
rings.

v2: Since all ringbuffer clients currently share the same timeline, we do
have to use the gem_context to distinguish clients.

As a bonus, include all the tracing used to debug the death inside
suspend.

v3: Test, test, test. Construct a selftest to exercise and assert the
expected behaviour that multiple switch-to-contexts do not emit
redundant requests.

Reported-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Fixes: a89d1f921c15 ("drm/i915: Split i915_gem_timeline into individual timelines")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180524081135.15278-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

1 files changed, 72 insertions, 14 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
index b69b18ef8120..45393f6e0208 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
@@ -576,30 +576,72 @@ last_request_on_engine(struct i915_timeline *timeline,
 {
 	struct i915_request *rq;
 
-	if (timeline == &engine->timeline)
-		return NULL;
+	GEM_BUG_ON(timeline == &engine->timeline);
 
 	rq = i915_gem_active_raw(&timeline->last_request,
 				 &engine->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
-	if (rq && rq->engine == engine)
+	if (rq && rq->engine == engine) {
+		GEM_TRACE("last request for %s on engine %s: %llx:%d\n",
+			  timeline->name, engine->name,
+			  rq->fence.context, rq->fence.seqno);
+		GEM_BUG_ON(rq->timeline != timeline);
 		return rq;
+	}
 
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static bool engine_has_idle_kernel_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+static bool engine_has_kernel_context_barrier(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
-	struct list_head * const active_rings = &engine->i915->gt.active_rings;
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = engine->i915;
+	const struct intel_context * const ce =
+		to_intel_context(i915->kernel_context, engine);
+	struct i915_timeline *barrier = ce->ring->timeline;
 	struct intel_ring *ring;
+	bool any_active = false;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&engine->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
+	list_for_each_entry(ring, &i915->gt.active_rings, active_link) {
+		struct i915_request *rq;
+
+		rq = last_request_on_engine(ring->timeline, engine);
+		if (!rq)
+			continue;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(ring, active_rings, active_link) {
-		if (last_request_on_engine(ring->timeline, engine))
+		any_active = true;
+
+		if (rq->gem_context == i915->kernel_context)
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * Was this request submitted after the previous
+		 * switch-to-kernel-context?
+		 */
+		if (!i915_timeline_sync_is_later(barrier, &rq->fence)) {
+			GEM_TRACE("%s needs barrier for %llx:%d\n",
+				  ring->timeline->name,
+				  rq->fence.context,
+				  rq->fence.seqno);
 			return false;
+		}
+
+		GEM_TRACE("%s has barrier after %llx:%d\n",
+			  ring->timeline->name,
+			  rq->fence.context,
+			  rq->fence.seqno);
 	}
 
-	return intel_engine_has_kernel_context(engine);
+	/*
+	 * If any other timeline was still active and behind the last barrier,
+	 * then our last switch-to-kernel-context must still be queued and
+	 * will run last (leaving the engine in the kernel context when it
+	 * eventually idles).
+	 */
+	if (any_active)
+		return true;
+
+	/* The engine is idle; check that it is idling in the kernel context. */
+	return engine->last_retired_context == ce;
 }
 
 int i915_gem_switch_to_kernel_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
@@ -607,7 +649,10 @@ int i915_gem_switch_to_kernel_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
 	enum intel_engine_id id;
 
+	GEM_TRACE("\n");
+
 	lockdep_assert_held(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915->kernel_context);
 
 	i915_retire_requests(i915);
 
@@ -615,9 +660,12 @@ int i915_gem_switch_to_kernel_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 		struct intel_ring *ring;
 		struct i915_request *rq;
 
-		if (engine_has_idle_kernel_context(engine))
+		GEM_BUG_ON(!to_intel_context(i915->kernel_context, engine));
+		if (engine_has_kernel_context_barrier(engine))
 			continue;
 
+		GEM_TRACE("emit barrier on %s\n", engine->name);
+
 		rq = i915_request_alloc(engine, i915->kernel_context);
 		if (IS_ERR(rq))
 			return PTR_ERR(rq);
@@ -627,10 +675,20 @@ int i915_gem_switch_to_kernel_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 			struct i915_request *prev;
 
 			prev = last_request_on_engine(ring->timeline, engine);
-			if (prev)
-				i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence_gfp(&rq->submit,
-								 &prev->submit,
-								 I915_FENCE_GFP);
+			if (!prev)
+				continue;
+
+			if (prev->gem_context == i915->kernel_context)
+				continue;
+
+			GEM_TRACE("add barrier on %s for %llx:%d\n",
+				  engine->name,
+				  prev->fence.context,
+				  prev->fence.seqno);
+			i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence_gfp(&rq->submit,
+							 &prev->submit,
+							 I915_FENCE_GFP);
+			i915_timeline_sync_set(rq->timeline, &prev->fence);
 		}
 
 		/*