summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>2017-03-03 22:08:24 +0300
committerChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>2017-03-03 23:19:13 +0300
commit61d3dc708077de316bdcafd66016c2285da07275 (patch)
treef5796f8ae6edc99f0cddb6377bea0153f569e1dc /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
parentb66255f0f77902ef41b09163a6a092d2d905e151 (diff)
downloadlinux-61d3dc708077de316bdcafd66016c2285da07275.tar.xz
drm/i915: Split breadcrumbs spinlock into two
As we now take the breadcrumbs spinlock within the interrupt handler, we wish to minimise its hold time. During the interrupt we do not care about the state of the full rbtree, only that of the first element, so we can guard that with a separate lock. v2: Rename first_wait to irq_wait to make it clearer that it is guarded by irq_lock. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170303190824.1330-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c12
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 70acbbf50c75..478f19d2f3d8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -726,14 +726,14 @@ static void i915_ring_seqno_info(struct seq_file *m,
seq_printf(m, "Current sequence (%s): %x\n",
engine->name, intel_engine_get_seqno(engine));
- spin_lock_irq(&b->lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&b->rb_lock);
for (rb = rb_first(&b->waiters); rb; rb = rb_next(rb)) {
struct intel_wait *w = rb_entry(rb, typeof(*w), node);
seq_printf(m, "Waiting (%s): %s [%d] on %x\n",
engine->name, w->tsk->comm, w->tsk->pid, w->seqno);
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&b->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&b->rb_lock);
}
static int i915_gem_seqno_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
@@ -1380,14 +1380,14 @@ static int i915_hangcheck_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
&dev_priv->gpu_error.missed_irq_rings)),
yesno(engine->hangcheck.stalled));
- spin_lock_irq(&b->lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&b->rb_lock);
for (rb = rb_first(&b->waiters); rb; rb = rb_next(rb)) {
struct intel_wait *w = rb_entry(rb, typeof(*w), node);
seq_printf(m, "\t%s [%d] waiting for %x\n",
w->tsk->comm, w->tsk->pid, w->seqno);
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&b->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&b->rb_lock);
seq_printf(m, "\tACTHD = 0x%08llx [current 0x%08llx]\n",
(long long)engine->hangcheck.acthd,
@@ -3385,14 +3385,14 @@ static int i915_engine_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
I915_READ(RING_PP_DIR_DCLV(engine)));
}
- spin_lock_irq(&b->lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&b->rb_lock);
for (rb = rb_first(&b->waiters); rb; rb = rb_next(rb)) {
struct intel_wait *w = rb_entry(rb, typeof(*w), node);
seq_printf(m, "\t%s [%d] waiting for %x\n",
w->tsk->comm, w->tsk->pid, w->seqno);
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&b->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&b->rb_lock);
seq_puts(m, "\n");
}