summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>2024-05-25 19:00:31 +0300
committerChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>2024-05-27 10:50:05 +0300
commit983095eaf6c161ef73d96152bfc1a99ca051cd57 (patch)
tree8d1cf11267c0ba44fff5a204b883f3744c2dfcfa /drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c
parent3d9d313d518c5bc9e5ab6aeab86c9fa4bece095c (diff)
downloadlinux-983095eaf6c161ef73d96152bfc1a99ca051cd57.tar.xz
dma-buf/fence-array: Add flex array to struct dma_fence_array
This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1][2]. The "struct dma_fence_array" can be refactored to add a flex array in order to have the "callback structures allocated behind the array" be more explicit. Do so: - makes the code more readable and safer. - allows using __counted_by() for additional checks - avoids some pointer arithmetic in dma_fence_array_enable_signaling() Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1] Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/160 [2] Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/8b4e556e07b5dd78bb8a39b67ea0a43b199083c8.1716652811.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c10
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c
index 9b3ce8948351..c74ac197d5fe 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static void dma_fence_array_cb_func(struct dma_fence *f,
static bool dma_fence_array_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence)
{
struct dma_fence_array *array = to_dma_fence_array(fence);
- struct dma_fence_array_cb *cb = (void *)(&array[1]);
+ struct dma_fence_array_cb *cb = array->callbacks;
unsigned i;
for (i = 0; i < array->num_fences; ++i) {
@@ -168,22 +168,20 @@ struct dma_fence_array *dma_fence_array_create(int num_fences,
bool signal_on_any)
{
struct dma_fence_array *array;
- size_t size = sizeof(*array);
WARN_ON(!num_fences || !fences);
- /* Allocate the callback structures behind the array. */
- size += num_fences * sizeof(struct dma_fence_array_cb);
- array = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ array = kzalloc(struct_size(array, callbacks, num_fences), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!array)
return NULL;
+ array->num_fences = num_fences;
+
spin_lock_init(&array->lock);
dma_fence_init(&array->base, &dma_fence_array_ops, &array->lock,
context, seqno);
init_irq_work(&array->work, irq_dma_fence_array_work);
- array->num_fences = num_fences;
atomic_set(&array->num_pending, signal_on_any ? 1 : num_fences);
array->fences = fences;