summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/base
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>2009-11-25 03:06:37 +0300
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>2009-11-29 18:51:27 +0300
commit862f89b3d4c6bf3caab7fc69661fc6e725edd00a (patch)
tree65d29f636f8c0f488524220b5accea674b5101cf /drivers/base
parenta8a8a669ea13d792296737505adc43ccacf3a648 (diff)
downloadlinux-862f89b3d4c6bf3caab7fc69661fc6e725edd00a.tar.xz
PM: fix irq enable/disable in runtime PM code
This patch (as1305) fixes a bug in the irq-enable settings and removes some related overhead in the runtime PM code. In __pm_runtime_resume(), within the scope of the original spin_lock_irq(), we know that irqs are disabled. There's no reason to go through a pair of enable/disable cycles when acquiring and releasing the parent's lock. In __pm_runtime_set_status(), irqs are already disabled when the parent's lock is acquired, and they must remain disabled when it is released. Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/base')
-rw-r--r--drivers/base/power/runtime.c12
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
index a770498a74ec..846d89e3d122 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
@@ -328,11 +328,11 @@ int __pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev, bool from_wq)
* necessary.
*/
parent = dev->parent;
- spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&dev->power.lock);
pm_runtime_get_noresume(parent);
- spin_lock_irq(&parent->power.lock);
+ spin_lock(&parent->power.lock);
/*
* We can resume if the parent's run-time PM is disabled or it
* is set to ignore children.
@@ -343,9 +343,9 @@ int __pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev, bool from_wq)
if (parent->power.runtime_status != RPM_ACTIVE)
retval = -EBUSY;
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&parent->power.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&parent->power.lock);
- spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
+ spin_lock(&dev->power.lock);
if (retval)
goto out;
goto repeat;
@@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ int __pm_runtime_set_status(struct device *dev, unsigned int status)
}
if (parent) {
- spin_lock_irq(&parent->power.lock);
+ spin_lock(&parent->power.lock);
/*
* It is invalid to put an active child under a parent that is
@@ -793,7 +793,7 @@ int __pm_runtime_set_status(struct device *dev, unsigned int status)
atomic_inc(&parent->power.child_count);
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&parent->power.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&parent->power.lock);
if (error)
goto out;