diff options
author | Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> | 2017-06-07 07:54:58 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2017-06-12 15:09:29 +0300 |
commit | 83848fbe7e6af978c080a88c130a67178b1ac0e4 (patch) | |
tree | d0768387438df3a229e80017c093e826f0b30cec /drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c | |
parent | 186f0a0d8e083505bd5cd23baa82b2205224d9ad (diff) | |
download | linux-83848fbe7e6af978c080a88c130a67178b1ac0e4.tar.xz |
ACPICA: Tables: Mechanism to handle late stage acpi_get_table() imbalance
Considering this case:
1. A program opens a sysfs table file 65535 times, it can increase
validation_count and first increment cause the table to be mapped:
validation_count = 65535
2. AML execution causes "Load" to be executed on the same
table, this time it cannot increase validation_count, so
validation_count remains:
validation_count = 65535
3. The program closes sysfs table file 65535 times, it can decrease
validation_count and the last decrement cause the table to be
unmapped:
validation_count = 0
4. AML code still accessing the loaded table, kernel crash can be
observed.
To prevent that from happening, add a validation_count threashold.
When it is reached, the validation_count can no longer be
incremented/decremented to invalidate the table descriptor (means
preventing table unmappings)
Note that code added in acpi_tb_put_table() is actually a no-op but
changes the warning message into a "warn once" one. Lv Zheng.
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
[ rjw: Changelog, comments ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c | 34 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c index 7abe66505739..0d2e98920069 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c @@ -416,9 +416,18 @@ acpi_tb_get_table(struct acpi_table_desc *table_desc, } } - table_desc->validation_count++; - if (table_desc->validation_count == 0) { - table_desc->validation_count--; + if (table_desc->validation_count < ACPI_MAX_TABLE_VALIDATIONS) { + table_desc->validation_count++; + + /* + * Detect validation_count overflows to ensure that the warning + * message will only be printed once. + */ + if (table_desc->validation_count >= ACPI_MAX_TABLE_VALIDATIONS) { + ACPI_WARNING((AE_INFO, + "Table %p, Validation count overflows\n", + table_desc)); + } } *out_table = table_desc->pointer; @@ -445,13 +454,20 @@ void acpi_tb_put_table(struct acpi_table_desc *table_desc) ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(acpi_tb_put_table); - if (table_desc->validation_count == 0) { - ACPI_WARNING((AE_INFO, - "Table %p, Validation count is zero before decrement\n", - table_desc)); - return_VOID; + if (table_desc->validation_count < ACPI_MAX_TABLE_VALIDATIONS) { + table_desc->validation_count--; + + /* + * Detect validation_count underflows to ensure that the warning + * message will only be printed once. + */ + if (table_desc->validation_count >= ACPI_MAX_TABLE_VALIDATIONS) { + ACPI_WARNING((AE_INFO, + "Table %p, Validation count underflows\n", + table_desc)); + return_VOID; + } } - table_desc->validation_count--; if (table_desc->validation_count == 0) { |