diff options
| author | Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> | 2018-01-17 19:41:51 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> | 2018-01-17 19:46:26 +0300 |
| commit | 7bed45954b95601230ebf387d3e4e20e4a3cc025 (patch) | |
| tree | 546b673aef51257fc7479cf73d71abe4f511c865 /block | |
| parent | 85cf955df8317bbc513663b5610979fdd6a0da2a (diff) | |
| download | linux-7bed45954b95601230ebf387d3e4e20e4a3cc025.tar.xz | |
blk-mq: make sure hctx->next_cpu is set correctly
When hctx->next_cpu is set from possible online CPUs, there is one
race in which hctx->next_cpu may be set as >= nr_cpu_ids, and finally
break workqueue.
The race can be triggered in the following two sitations:
1) when one CPU is becoming DEAD, blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead() is called
to dispatch requests from the DEAD cpu context, but at that
time, this DEAD CPU has been cleared from 'cpu_online_mask', so all
CPUs in hctx->cpumask may become offline, and cause hctx->next_cpu set
a bad value.
2) blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() is called from CPU B, and found the queue
should be run on the other CPU A, then CPU A may become offline at the
same time and all CPUs in hctx->cpumask become offline.
This patch deals with this issue by re-selecting next CPU, and making
sure it is set correctly.
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reported-by: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
Tested-by: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
Fixes: 20e4d81393 ("blk-mq: simplify queue mapping & schedule with each possisble CPU")
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Diffstat (limited to 'block')
| -rw-r--r-- | block/blk-mq.c | 30 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index c8f62e6be6b6..3bd41f1066ee 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -1319,21 +1319,47 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) */ static int blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) { + bool tried = false; + if (hctx->queue->nr_hw_queues == 1) return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND; if (--hctx->next_cpu_batch <= 0) { int next_cpu; - +select_cpu: next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(hctx->next_cpu, hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask); if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) next_cpu = cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask,cpu_online_mask); - hctx->next_cpu = next_cpu; + /* + * No online CPU is found, so have to make sure hctx->next_cpu + * is set correctly for not breaking workqueue. + */ + if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) + hctx->next_cpu = cpumask_first(hctx->cpumask); + else + hctx->next_cpu = next_cpu; hctx->next_cpu_batch = BLK_MQ_CPU_WORK_BATCH; } + /* + * Do unbound schedule if we can't find a online CPU for this hctx, + * and it should only happen in the path of handling CPU DEAD. + */ + if (!cpu_online(hctx->next_cpu)) { + if (!tried) { + tried = true; + goto select_cpu; + } + + /* + * Make sure to re-select CPU next time once after CPUs + * in hctx->cpumask become online again. + */ + hctx->next_cpu_batch = 1; + return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND; + } return hctx->next_cpu; } |