summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>2014-02-12 15:43:40 +0400
committerMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>2014-02-21 11:50:20 +0400
commitdb85eaeb52637eb91a7bbc70f6684f5563b983e9 (patch)
tree5e39493f8d878f4325c346563e96128ef76b8d86 /arch
parentdeedabb2b4a68a63351a949b1abcf73fc97eb406 (diff)
downloadlinux-db85eaeb52637eb91a7bbc70f6684f5563b983e9.tar.xz
s390/bitops: fix comment
Fix some numbers in the comments describing the layout of the bit maps. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
-rw-r--r--arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h8
-rw-r--r--arch/s390/lib/find.c2
2 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h
index 6e6ad0680829..ec5ef891db6b 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h
@@ -13,9 +13,9 @@
*
* The bitop functions are defined to work on unsigned longs, so for an
* s390x system the bits end up numbered:
- * |63..............0|127............64|191...........128|255...........196|
+ * |63..............0|127............64|191...........128|255...........192|
* and on s390:
- * |31.....0|63....31|95....64|127...96|159..128|191..160|223..192|255..224|
+ * |31.....0|63....32|95....64|127...96|159..128|191..160|223..192|255..224|
*
* There are a few little-endian macros used mostly for filesystem
* bitmaps, these work on similar bit arrays layouts, but
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
* on an s390x system the bits are numbered:
* |0..............63|64............127|128...........191|192...........255|
* and on s390:
- * |0.....31|31....63|64....95|96...127|128..159|160..191|192..223|224..255|
+ * |0.....31|32....63|64....95|96...127|128..159|160..191|192..223|224..255|
*
* The main difference is that bit 0-63 (64b) or 0-31 (32b) in the bit
* number field needs to be reversed compared to the LSB0 encoded bit
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static inline int test_bit(unsigned long nr, const volatile unsigned long *ptr)
* On an s390x system the bits are numbered:
* |0..............63|64............127|128...........191|192...........255|
* and on s390:
- * |0.....31|31....63|64....95|96...127|128..159|160..191|192..223|224..255|
+ * |0.....31|32....63|64....95|96...127|128..159|160..191|192..223|224..255|
*/
unsigned long find_first_bit_inv(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size);
unsigned long find_next_bit_inv(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size,
diff --git a/arch/s390/lib/find.c b/arch/s390/lib/find.c
index 620d34d6487e..922003c1b90d 100644
--- a/arch/s390/lib/find.c
+++ b/arch/s390/lib/find.c
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
* On s390x the bits are numbered:
* |0..............63|64............127|128...........191|192...........255|
* and on s390:
- * |0.....31|31....63|64....95|96...127|128..159|160..191|192..223|224..255|
+ * |0.....31|32....63|64....95|96...127|128..159|160..191|192..223|224..255|
*
* The reason for this bit numbering is the fact that the hardware sets bits
* in a bitmap starting at bit 0 (MSB) and we don't want to scan the bitmap