diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2021-08-31 01:00:33 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2021-08-31 01:00:33 +0300 |
commit | 0a096f240aa1992ddac65f8e704f7b0c0795fe1c (patch) | |
tree | 04c64aca17b94b0862214e09784fc23b413df578 /arch/x86/mm | |
parent | 7d6e3fa87e732ec1e7761bf325c0907685c8571b (diff) | |
parent | b7fe54f6c2d437082dcbecfbd832f38edd9caaf4 (diff) | |
download | linux-0a096f240aa1992ddac65f8e704f7b0c0795fe1c.tar.xz |
Merge tag 'x86-cpu-2021-08-30' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 cache flush updates from Thomas Gleixner:
"A reworked version of the opt-in L1D flush mechanism.
This is a stop gap for potential future speculation related hardware
vulnerabilities and a mechanism for truly security paranoid
applications.
It allows a task to request that the L1D cache is flushed when the
kernel switches to a different mm. This can be requested via prctl().
Changes vs the previous versions:
- Get rid of the software flush fallback
- Make the handling consistent with other mitigations
- Kill the task when it ends up on a SMT enabled core which defeats
the purpose of L1D flushing obviously"
* tag 'x86-cpu-2021-08-30' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
Documentation: Add L1D flushing Documentation
x86, prctl: Hook L1D flushing in via prctl
x86/mm: Prepare for opt-in based L1D flush in switch_mm()
x86/process: Make room for TIF_SPEC_L1D_FLUSH
sched: Add task_work callback for paranoid L1D flush
x86/mm: Refactor cond_ibpb() to support other use cases
x86/smp: Add a per-cpu view of SMT state
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/mm')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 107 |
1 files changed, 83 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c index cfe6b1e85fa6..59ba2968af1b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c @@ -8,11 +8,13 @@ #include <linux/export.h> #include <linux/cpu.h> #include <linux/debugfs.h> +#include <linux/sched/smt.h> #include <asm/tlbflush.h> #include <asm/mmu_context.h> #include <asm/nospec-branch.h> #include <asm/cache.h> +#include <asm/cacheflush.h> #include <asm/apic.h> #include <asm/perf_event.h> @@ -43,10 +45,15 @@ */ /* - * Use bit 0 to mangle the TIF_SPEC_IB state into the mm pointer which is - * stored in cpu_tlb_state.last_user_mm_ibpb. + * Bits to mangle the TIF_SPEC_* state into the mm pointer which is + * stored in cpu_tlb_state.last_user_mm_spec. */ #define LAST_USER_MM_IBPB 0x1UL +#define LAST_USER_MM_L1D_FLUSH 0x2UL +#define LAST_USER_MM_SPEC_MASK (LAST_USER_MM_IBPB | LAST_USER_MM_L1D_FLUSH) + +/* Bits to set when tlbstate and flush is (re)initialized */ +#define LAST_USER_MM_INIT LAST_USER_MM_IBPB /* * The x86 feature is called PCID (Process Context IDentifier). It is similar @@ -317,20 +324,70 @@ void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next, local_irq_restore(flags); } -static unsigned long mm_mangle_tif_spec_ib(struct task_struct *next) +/* + * Invoked from return to user/guest by a task that opted-in to L1D + * flushing but ended up running on an SMT enabled core due to wrong + * affinity settings or CPU hotplug. This is part of the paranoid L1D flush + * contract which this task requested. + */ +static void l1d_flush_force_sigbus(struct callback_head *ch) +{ + force_sig(SIGBUS); +} + +static void l1d_flush_evaluate(unsigned long prev_mm, unsigned long next_mm, + struct task_struct *next) +{ + /* Flush L1D if the outgoing task requests it */ + if (prev_mm & LAST_USER_MM_L1D_FLUSH) + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_FLUSH_CMD, L1D_FLUSH); + + /* Check whether the incoming task opted in for L1D flush */ + if (likely(!(next_mm & LAST_USER_MM_L1D_FLUSH))) + return; + + /* + * Validate that it is not running on an SMT sibling as this would + * make the excercise pointless because the siblings share L1D. If + * it runs on a SMT sibling, notify it with SIGBUS on return to + * user/guest + */ + if (this_cpu_read(cpu_info.smt_active)) { + clear_ti_thread_flag(&next->thread_info, TIF_SPEC_L1D_FLUSH); + next->l1d_flush_kill.func = l1d_flush_force_sigbus; + task_work_add(next, &next->l1d_flush_kill, TWA_RESUME); + } +} + +static unsigned long mm_mangle_tif_spec_bits(struct task_struct *next) { unsigned long next_tif = task_thread_info(next)->flags; - unsigned long ibpb = (next_tif >> TIF_SPEC_IB) & LAST_USER_MM_IBPB; + unsigned long spec_bits = (next_tif >> TIF_SPEC_IB) & LAST_USER_MM_SPEC_MASK; - return (unsigned long)next->mm | ibpb; + /* + * Ensure that the bit shift above works as expected and the two flags + * end up in bit 0 and 1. + */ + BUILD_BUG_ON(TIF_SPEC_L1D_FLUSH != TIF_SPEC_IB + 1); + + return (unsigned long)next->mm | spec_bits; } -static void cond_ibpb(struct task_struct *next) +static void cond_mitigation(struct task_struct *next) { + unsigned long prev_mm, next_mm; + if (!next || !next->mm) return; + next_mm = mm_mangle_tif_spec_bits(next); + prev_mm = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.last_user_mm_spec); + /* + * Avoid user/user BTB poisoning by flushing the branch predictor + * when switching between processes. This stops one process from + * doing Spectre-v2 attacks on another. + * * Both, the conditional and the always IBPB mode use the mm * pointer to avoid the IBPB when switching between tasks of the * same process. Using the mm pointer instead of mm->context.ctx_id @@ -340,8 +397,6 @@ static void cond_ibpb(struct task_struct *next) * exposed data is not really interesting. */ if (static_branch_likely(&switch_mm_cond_ibpb)) { - unsigned long prev_mm, next_mm; - /* * This is a bit more complex than the always mode because * it has to handle two cases: @@ -371,20 +426,14 @@ static void cond_ibpb(struct task_struct *next) * Optimize this with reasonably small overhead for the * above cases. Mangle the TIF_SPEC_IB bit into the mm * pointer of the incoming task which is stored in - * cpu_tlbstate.last_user_mm_ibpb for comparison. - */ - next_mm = mm_mangle_tif_spec_ib(next); - prev_mm = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.last_user_mm_ibpb); - - /* + * cpu_tlbstate.last_user_mm_spec for comparison. + * * Issue IBPB only if the mm's are different and one or * both have the IBPB bit set. */ if (next_mm != prev_mm && (next_mm | prev_mm) & LAST_USER_MM_IBPB) indirect_branch_prediction_barrier(); - - this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.last_user_mm_ibpb, next_mm); } if (static_branch_unlikely(&switch_mm_always_ibpb)) { @@ -393,11 +442,22 @@ static void cond_ibpb(struct task_struct *next) * different context than the user space task which ran * last on this CPU. */ - if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.last_user_mm) != next->mm) { + if ((prev_mm & ~LAST_USER_MM_SPEC_MASK) != + (unsigned long)next->mm) indirect_branch_prediction_barrier(); - this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.last_user_mm, next->mm); - } } + + if (static_branch_unlikely(&switch_mm_cond_l1d_flush)) { + /* + * Flush L1D when the outgoing task requested it and/or + * check whether the incoming task requested L1D flushing + * and ended up on an SMT sibling. + */ + if (unlikely((prev_mm | next_mm) & LAST_USER_MM_L1D_FLUSH)) + l1d_flush_evaluate(prev_mm, next_mm, next); + } + + this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.last_user_mm_spec, next_mm); } #ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS @@ -531,11 +591,10 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next, need_flush = true; } else { /* - * Avoid user/user BTB poisoning by flushing the branch - * predictor when switching between processes. This stops - * one process from doing Spectre-v2 attacks on another. + * Apply process to process speculation vulnerability + * mitigations if applicable. */ - cond_ibpb(tsk); + cond_mitigation(tsk); /* * Stop remote flushes for the previous mm. @@ -643,7 +702,7 @@ void initialize_tlbstate_and_flush(void) write_cr3(build_cr3(mm->pgd, 0)); /* Reinitialize tlbstate. */ - this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.last_user_mm_ibpb, LAST_USER_MM_IBPB); + this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.last_user_mm_spec, LAST_USER_MM_INIT); this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm_asid, 0); this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.next_asid, 1); this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.ctxs[0].ctx_id, mm->context.ctx_id); |