Merge tag 'pm-5.2-rc1-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm

Pull more power management updates from Rafael Wysocki:
 "These fix a recent regression causing kernels built with CONFIG_PM
  unset to crash on systems that support the Performance and Energy Bias
  Hint (EPB), clean up the cpufreq core and some users of transition
  notifiers and introduce a new power domain flag into the generic power
  domains framework (genpd).

  Specifics:

   - Fix recent regression causing kernels built with CONFIG_PM unset to
     crash on systems that support the Performance and Energy Bias Hint
     (EPB) by avoiding to compile the EPB-related code depending on
     CONFIG_PM when it is unset (Rafael Wysocki).

   - Clean up the transition notifier invocation code in the cpufreq
     core and change some users of cpufreq transition notifiers
     accordingly (Viresh Kumar).

   - Change MAINTAINERS to cover the schedutil governor as part of
     cpufreq (Viresh Kumar).

   - Simplify cpufreq_init_policy() to avoid redundant computations (Yue
     Hu).

   - Add explanatory comment to the cpufreq core (Rafael Wysocki).

   - Introduce a new flag, GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON, to the generic
     power domains (genpd) framework along with the first user of it
     (Leonard Crestez)"

* tag 'pm-5.2-rc1-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm:
  soc: imx: gpc: Use GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON for ERR009619
  PM / Domains: Add GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON flag
  cpufreq: Update MAINTAINERS to include schedutil governor
  cpufreq: Don't find governor for setpolicy drivers in cpufreq_init_policy()
  cpufreq: Explain the kobject_put() in cpufreq_policy_alloc()
  cpufreq: Call transition notifier only once for each policy
  x86: intel_epb: Take CONFIG_PM into account

1 files changed, 20 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index d75bb97b983c..b9591abde62a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -6698,10 +6698,8 @@ static void kvm_hyperv_tsc_notifier(void)
 }
 #endif
 
-static int kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
-				     void *data)
+static void __kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(struct cpufreq_freqs *freq, int cpu)
 {
-	struct cpufreq_freqs *freq = data;
 	struct kvm *kvm;
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	int i, send_ipi = 0;
@@ -6745,17 +6743,12 @@ static int kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long va
 	 *
 	 */
 
-	if (val == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE && freq->old > freq->new)
-		return 0;
-	if (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old < freq->new)
-		return 0;
-
-	smp_call_function_single(freq->cpu, tsc_khz_changed, freq, 1);
+	smp_call_function_single(cpu, tsc_khz_changed, freq, 1);
 
 	spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list) {
 		kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
-			if (vcpu->cpu != freq->cpu)
+			if (vcpu->cpu != cpu)
 				continue;
 			kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu);
 			if (vcpu->cpu != smp_processor_id())
@@ -6777,8 +6770,24 @@ static int kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long va
 		 * guest context is entered kvmclock will be updated,
 		 * so the guest will not see stale values.
 		 */
-		smp_call_function_single(freq->cpu, tsc_khz_changed, freq, 1);
+		smp_call_function_single(cpu, tsc_khz_changed, freq, 1);
 	}
+}
+
+static int kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
+				     void *data)
+{
+	struct cpufreq_freqs *freq = data;
+	int cpu;
+
+	if (val == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE && freq->old > freq->new)
+		return 0;
+	if (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old < freq->new)
+		return 0;
+
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, freq->policy->cpus)
+		__kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(freq, cpu);
+
 	return 0;
 }