diff options
| author | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> | 2020-05-19 20:25:06 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2020-06-15 15:10:00 +0300 |
| commit | 3dc167ba5729ddd2d8e3fa1841653792c295d3f1 (patch) | |
| tree | d3348dfe2edc313740bfd0b348d91d36726f9cc1 /arch/x86/include | |
| parent | b3a9e3b9622ae10064826dccb4f7a52bd88c7407 (diff) | |
| download | linux-3dc167ba5729ddd2d8e3fa1841653792c295d3f1.tar.xz | |
sched/cputime: Improve cputime_adjust()
People report that utime and stime from /proc/<pid>/stat become very
wrong when the numbers are big enough, especially if you watch these
counters incrementally.
Specifically, the current implementation of: stime*rtime/total,
results in a saw-tooth function on top of the desired line, where the
teeth grow in size the larger the values become. IOW, it has a
relative error.
The result is that, when watching incrementally as time progresses
(for large values), we'll see periods of pure stime or utime increase,
irrespective of the actual ratio we're striving for.
Replace scale_stime() with a math64.h helper: mul_u64_u64_div_u64()
that is far more accurate. This also allows architectures to override
the implementation -- for instance they can opt for the old algorithm
if this new one turns out to be too expensive for them.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200519172506.GA317395@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/include')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h | 14 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h index 9b8cb50768c2..b8f1dc0761e4 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h @@ -74,16 +74,26 @@ static inline u64 mul_u32_u32(u32 a, u32 b) #else # include <asm-generic/div64.h> -static inline u64 mul_u64_u32_div(u64 a, u32 mul, u32 div) +/* + * Will generate an #DE when the result doesn't fit u64, could fix with an + * __ex_table[] entry when it becomes an issue. + */ +static inline u64 mul_u64_u64_div_u64(u64 a, u64 mul, u64 div) { u64 q; asm ("mulq %2; divq %3" : "=a" (q) - : "a" (a), "rm" ((u64)mul), "rm" ((u64)div) + : "a" (a), "rm" (mul), "rm" (div) : "rdx"); return q; } +#define mul_u64_u64_div_u64 mul_u64_u64_div_u64 + +static inline u64 mul_u64_u32_div(u64 a, u32 mul, u32 div) +{ + return mul_u64_u64_div_u64(a, mul, div); +} #define mul_u64_u32_div mul_u64_u32_div #endif /* CONFIG_X86_32 */ |