perf/x86/core: Pass "struct kvm_pmu *" to determine the guest values

Splitting the logic for determining the guest values is unnecessarily
confusing, and potentially fragile. Perf should have full knowledge and
control of what values are loaded for the guest.

If we change .guest_get_msrs() to take a struct kvm_pmu pointer, then it
can generate the full set of guest values by grabbing guest ds_area and
pebs_data_cfg. Alternatively, .guest_get_msrs() could take the desired
guest MSR values directly (ds_area and pebs_data_cfg), but kvm_pmu is
vendor agnostic, so we don't see any reason to not just pass the pointer.

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Message-Id: <20220411101946.20262-4-likexu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index f95ab4da6fea..58e2fcbb8bcc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -519,10 +519,10 @@ static inline void perf_check_microcode(void) { }
 #endif
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS) && defined(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL)
-extern struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr);
+extern struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr, void *data);
 extern int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr);
 #else
-struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr);
+struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr, void *data);
 static inline int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr)
 {
 	return -1;