asm-generic: merge branch 'master' of torvalds/linux-2.6

Fixes a merge conflict against the x86 tree caused by a fix to
atomic.h which I renamed to atomic_long.h.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

1 files changed, 39 insertions, 40 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/memory.c b/arch/x86/boot/memory.c
index 74b3d2ba84e9..cae3feb1035e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/memory.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/memory.c
@@ -20,12 +20,16 @@
 static int detect_memory_e820(void)
 {
 	int count = 0;
-	u32 next = 0;
-	u32 size, id, edi;
-	u8 err;
+	struct biosregs ireg, oreg;
 	struct e820entry *desc = boot_params.e820_map;
 	static struct e820entry buf; /* static so it is zeroed */
 
+	initregs(&ireg);
+	ireg.ax  = 0xe820;
+	ireg.cx  = sizeof buf;
+	ireg.edx = SMAP;
+	ireg.di  = (size_t)&buf;
+
 	/*
 	 * Note: at least one BIOS is known which assumes that the
 	 * buffer pointed to by one e820 call is the same one as
@@ -41,22 +45,13 @@ static int detect_memory_e820(void)
 	 */
 
 	do {
-		size = sizeof buf;
-
-		/* Important: %edx and %esi are clobbered by some BIOSes,
-		   so they must be either used for the error output
-		   or explicitly marked clobbered.  Given that, assume there
-		   is something out there clobbering %ebp and %edi, too. */
-		asm("pushl %%ebp; int $0x15; popl %%ebp; setc %0"
-		    : "=d" (err), "+b" (next), "=a" (id), "+c" (size),
-		      "=D" (edi), "+m" (buf)
-		    : "D" (&buf), "d" (SMAP), "a" (0xe820)
-		    : "esi");
+		intcall(0x15, &ireg, &oreg);
+		ireg.ebx = oreg.ebx; /* for next iteration... */
 
 		/* BIOSes which terminate the chain with CF = 1 as opposed
 		   to %ebx = 0 don't always report the SMAP signature on
 		   the final, failing, probe. */
-		if (err)
+		if (oreg.eflags & X86_EFLAGS_CF)
 			break;
 
 		/* Some BIOSes stop returning SMAP in the middle of
@@ -64,60 +59,64 @@ static int detect_memory_e820(void)
 		   screwed up the map at that point, we might have a
 		   partial map, the full map, or complete garbage, so
 		   just return failure. */
-		if (id != SMAP) {
+		if (oreg.eax != SMAP) {
 			count = 0;
 			break;
 		}
 
 		*desc++ = buf;
 		count++;
-	} while (next && count < ARRAY_SIZE(boot_params.e820_map));
+	} while (ireg.ebx && count < ARRAY_SIZE(boot_params.e820_map));
 
 	return boot_params.e820_entries = count;
 }
 
 static int detect_memory_e801(void)
 {
-	u16 ax, bx, cx, dx;
-	u8 err;
+	struct biosregs ireg, oreg;
 
-	bx = cx = dx = 0;
-	ax = 0xe801;
-	asm("stc; int $0x15; setc %0"
-	    : "=m" (err), "+a" (ax), "+b" (bx), "+c" (cx), "+d" (dx));
+	initregs(&ireg);
+	ireg.ax = 0xe801;
+	intcall(0x15, &ireg, &oreg);
 
-	if (err)
+	if (oreg.eflags & X86_EFLAGS_CF)
 		return -1;
 
 	/* Do we really need to do this? */
-	if (cx || dx) {
-		ax = cx;
-		bx = dx;
+	if (oreg.cx || oreg.dx) {
+		oreg.ax = oreg.cx;
+		oreg.bx = oreg.dx;
 	}
 
-	if (ax > 15*1024)
+	if (oreg.ax > 15*1024) {
 		return -1;	/* Bogus! */
-
-	/* This ignores memory above 16MB if we have a memory hole
-	   there.  If someone actually finds a machine with a memory
-	   hole at 16MB and no support for 0E820h they should probably
-	   generate a fake e820 map. */
-	boot_params.alt_mem_k = (ax == 15*1024) ? (dx << 6)+ax : ax;
+	} else if (oreg.ax == 15*1024) {
+		boot_params.alt_mem_k = (oreg.dx << 6) + oreg.ax;
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * This ignores memory above 16MB if we have a memory
+		 * hole there.  If someone actually finds a machine
+		 * with a memory hole at 16MB and no support for
+		 * 0E820h they should probably generate a fake e820
+		 * map.
+		 */
+		boot_params.alt_mem_k = oreg.ax;
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static int detect_memory_88(void)
 {
-	u16 ax;
-	u8 err;
+	struct biosregs ireg, oreg;
 
-	ax = 0x8800;
-	asm("stc; int $0x15; setc %0" : "=bcdm" (err), "+a" (ax));
+	initregs(&ireg);
+	ireg.ah = 0x88;
+	intcall(0x15, &ireg, &oreg);
 
-	boot_params.screen_info.ext_mem_k = ax;
+	boot_params.screen_info.ext_mem_k = oreg.ax;
 
-	return -err;
+	return -(oreg.eflags & X86_EFLAGS_CF); /* 0 or -1 */
 }
 
 int detect_memory(void)