diff options
author | Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com> | 2008-12-16 11:32:21 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2008-12-16 12:17:02 +0300 |
commit | 205516c12dbba003c26b42cfb41e598631300106 (patch) | |
tree | a392f1fd4735ac67fa6ff01d1f3961bde7cd527b /arch/sparc | |
parent | 5279585ff2bedc8180da5bdf8aa3ff1736466de2 (diff) | |
download | linux-205516c12dbba003c26b42cfb41e598631300106.tar.xz |
x86: convert rdtscll() to use __native_read_tsc
Impact: micro-optimization
Is there any reason why x86 rdtscll have to use the out of line
function instead of inline __native_read_tsc()? native_read_tsc and
__native_read_tsc is essentially the same functions.
Patch to let x86 rdtscll() to use the inline version of read_tsc.
Signed-off-by: Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/sparc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions