diff options
| author | Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com> | 2020-03-17 14:59:37 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> | 2020-03-23 15:41:55 +0300 |
| commit | 969ae01bab2fe938b4c8324836038b5ac1c78fac (patch) | |
| tree | cc7d13c212ed56f892adb745ac72bbd0c9e6778b /arch/s390/pci | |
| parent | 9289224040cb120605ffa35263ea27a30105019e (diff) | |
| download | linux-969ae01bab2fe938b4c8324836038b5ac1c78fac.tar.xz | |
s390/pci: Fix zpci_alloc_domain() over allocation
Until now zpci_alloc_domain() only prevented more than
CONFIG_PCI_NR_FUNCTIONS from being added when using automatic domain
allocation. When explicit UIDs were defined UIDs above
CONFIG_PCI_NR_FUNCTIONS were not counted at all.
When more PCI functions are added this could lead to various errors
including under sized IRQ vectors and similar issues.
Fix this by explicitly tracking the number of allocated domains.
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/s390/pci')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/s390/pci/pci.c | 34 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c index d4eaba24e300..2b90a90aa81d 100644 --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c @@ -40,8 +40,9 @@ static LIST_HEAD(zpci_list); static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(zpci_list_lock); -static DECLARE_BITMAP(zpci_domain, ZPCI_NR_DEVICES); +static DECLARE_BITMAP(zpci_domain, ZPCI_DOMAIN_BITMAP_SIZE); static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(zpci_domain_lock); +static unsigned int zpci_num_domains_allocated; #define ZPCI_IOMAP_ENTRIES \ min(((unsigned long) ZPCI_NR_DEVICES * PCI_STD_NUM_BARS / 2), \ @@ -609,12 +610,16 @@ void pcibios_disable_device(struct pci_dev *pdev) static int zpci_alloc_domain(struct zpci_dev *zdev) { + spin_lock(&zpci_domain_lock); + if (zpci_num_domains_allocated > (ZPCI_NR_DEVICES - 1)) { + spin_unlock(&zpci_domain_lock); + pr_err("Adding PCI function %08x failed because the configured limit of %d is reached\n", + zdev->fid, ZPCI_NR_DEVICES); + return -ENOSPC; + } + if (zpci_unique_uid) { zdev->domain = (u16) zdev->uid; - if (zdev->domain >= ZPCI_NR_DEVICES) - return 0; - - spin_lock(&zpci_domain_lock); if (test_bit(zdev->domain, zpci_domain)) { spin_unlock(&zpci_domain_lock); pr_err("Adding PCI function %08x failed because domain %04x is already assigned\n", @@ -622,30 +627,27 @@ static int zpci_alloc_domain(struct zpci_dev *zdev) return -EEXIST; } set_bit(zdev->domain, zpci_domain); + zpci_num_domains_allocated++; spin_unlock(&zpci_domain_lock); return 0; } - - spin_lock(&zpci_domain_lock); + /* + * We can always auto allocate domains below ZPCI_NR_DEVICES. + * There is either a free domain or we have reached the maximum in + * which case we would have bailed earlier. + */ zdev->domain = find_first_zero_bit(zpci_domain, ZPCI_NR_DEVICES); - if (zdev->domain == ZPCI_NR_DEVICES) { - spin_unlock(&zpci_domain_lock); - pr_err("Adding PCI function %08x failed because the configured limit of %d is reached\n", - zdev->fid, ZPCI_NR_DEVICES); - return -ENOSPC; - } set_bit(zdev->domain, zpci_domain); + zpci_num_domains_allocated++; spin_unlock(&zpci_domain_lock); return 0; } static void zpci_free_domain(struct zpci_dev *zdev) { - if (zdev->domain >= ZPCI_NR_DEVICES) - return; - spin_lock(&zpci_domain_lock); clear_bit(zdev->domain, zpci_domain); + zpci_num_domains_allocated--; spin_unlock(&zpci_domain_lock); } |