Generic semaphore implementation

Semaphores are no longer performance-critical, so a generic C
implementation is better for maintainability, debuggability and
extensibility.  Thanks to Peter Zijlstra for fixing the lockdep
warning.  Thanks to Harvey Harrison for pointing out that the
unlikely() was unnecessary.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 131 deletions

diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/semaphore.c b/arch/ppc/kernel/semaphore.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 2fe429b27c14..000000000000
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel/semaphore.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,131 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * PowerPC-specific semaphore code.
- *
- * Copyright (C) 1999 Cort Dougan <cort@cs.nmt.edu>
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
- * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
- * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
- * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
- *
- * April 2001 - Reworked by Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
- * to eliminate the SMP races in the old version between the updates
- * of `count' and `waking'.  Now we use negative `count' values to
- * indicate that some process(es) are waiting for the semaphore.
- */
-
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <asm/atomic.h>
-#include <asm/semaphore.h>
-#include <asm/errno.h>
-
-/*
- * Atomically update sem->count.
- * This does the equivalent of the following:
- *
- *	old_count = sem->count;
- *	tmp = MAX(old_count, 0) + incr;
- *	sem->count = tmp;
- *	return old_count;
- */
-static inline int __sem_update_count(struct semaphore *sem, int incr)
-{
-	int old_count, tmp;
-
-	__asm__ __volatile__("\n"
-"1:	lwarx	%0,0,%3\n"
-"	srawi	%1,%0,31\n"
-"	andc	%1,%0,%1\n"
-"	add	%1,%1,%4\n"
-	PPC405_ERR77(0,%3)
-"	stwcx.	%1,0,%3\n"
-"	bne	1b"
-	: "=&r" (old_count), "=&r" (tmp), "=m" (sem->count)
-	: "r" (&sem->count), "r" (incr), "m" (sem->count)
-	: "cc");
-
-	return old_count;
-}
-
-void __up(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	/*
-	 * Note that we incremented count in up() before we came here,
-	 * but that was ineffective since the result was <= 0, and
-	 * any negative value of count is equivalent to 0.
-	 * This ends up setting count to 1, unless count is now > 0
-	 * (i.e. because some other cpu has called up() in the meantime),
-	 * in which case we just increment count.
-	 */
-	__sem_update_count(sem, 1);
-	wake_up(&sem->wait);
-}
-
-/*
- * Note that when we come in to __down or __down_interruptible,
- * we have already decremented count, but that decrement was
- * ineffective since the result was < 0, and any negative value
- * of count is equivalent to 0.
- * Thus it is only when we decrement count from some value > 0
- * that we have actually got the semaphore.
- */
-void __sched __down(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
-
-	tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
-	add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->wait, &wait);
-	smp_wmb();
-
-	/*
-	 * Try to get the semaphore.  If the count is > 0, then we've
-	 * got the semaphore; we decrement count and exit the loop.
-	 * If the count is 0 or negative, we set it to -1, indicating
-	 * that we are asleep, and then sleep.
-	 */
-	while (__sem_update_count(sem, -1) <= 0) {
-		schedule();
-		tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
-	}
-	remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
-	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
-
-	/*
-	 * If there are any more sleepers, wake one of them up so
-	 * that it can either get the semaphore, or set count to -1
-	 * indicating that there are still processes sleeping.
-	 */
-	wake_up(&sem->wait);
-}
-
-int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore * sem)
-{
-	int retval = 0;
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
-
-	tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
-	add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->wait, &wait);
-	smp_wmb();
-
-	while (__sem_update_count(sem, -1) <= 0) {
-		if (signal_pending(current)) {
-			/*
-			 * A signal is pending - give up trying.
-			 * Set sem->count to 0 if it is negative,
-			 * since we are no longer sleeping.
-			 */
-			__sem_update_count(sem, 0);
-			retval = -EINTR;
-			break;
-		}
-		schedule();
-		tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
-	}
-	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
-	remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
-	wake_up(&sem->wait);
-	return retval;
-}