clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
index 19397e2a8bf5..bc2e08d415fa 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
 #include <linux/clockchips.h>
 #include <linux/timekeeper_internal.h>
 
-static cycle_t rtc_read(struct clocksource *);
+static u64 rtc_read(struct clocksource *);
 static struct clocksource clocksource_rtc = {
 	.name         = "rtc",
 	.rating       = 400,
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static struct clocksource clocksource_rtc = {
 	.read         = rtc_read,
 };
 
-static cycle_t timebase_read(struct clocksource *);
+static u64 timebase_read(struct clocksource *);
 static struct clocksource clocksource_timebase = {
 	.name         = "timebase",
 	.rating       = 400,
@@ -802,18 +802,18 @@ void read_persistent_clock(struct timespec *ts)
 }
 
 /* clocksource code */
-static cycle_t rtc_read(struct clocksource *cs)
+static u64 rtc_read(struct clocksource *cs)
 {
-	return (cycle_t)get_rtc();
+	return (u64)get_rtc();
 }
 
-static cycle_t timebase_read(struct clocksource *cs)
+static u64 timebase_read(struct clocksource *cs)
 {
-	return (cycle_t)get_tb();
+	return (u64)get_tb();
 }
 
 void update_vsyscall_old(struct timespec *wall_time, struct timespec *wtm,
-			 struct clocksource *clock, u32 mult, cycle_t cycle_last)
+			 struct clocksource *clock, u32 mult, u64 cycle_last)
 {
 	u64 new_tb_to_xs, new_stamp_xsec;
 	u32 frac_sec;