diff options
author | Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> | 2013-03-09 03:18:28 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2013-03-09 03:18:28 +0400 |
commit | eb2834285cf172856cd12f66892fc7467935ebed (patch) | |
tree | bf0a3125e85b7acf2dc43e0d4f82b68459e77a36 /arch/arm/mach-netx/generic.c | |
parent | 6dbe51c251a327e012439c4772097a13df43c5b8 (diff) | |
download | linux-eb2834285cf172856cd12f66892fc7467935ebed.tar.xz |
workqueue: fix possible pool stall bug in wq_unbind_fn()
Since multiple pools per cpu have been introduced, wq_unbind_fn() has
a subtle bug which may theoretically stall work item processing. The
problem is two-fold.
* wq_unbind_fn() depends on the worker executing wq_unbind_fn() itself
to start unbound chain execution, which works fine when there was
only single pool. With multiple pools, only the pool which is
running wq_unbind_fn() - the highpri one - is guaranteed to have
such kick-off. The other pool could stall when its busy workers
block.
* The current code is setting WORKER_UNBIND / POOL_DISASSOCIATED of
the two pools in succession without initiating work execution
inbetween. Because setting the flags requires grabbing assoc_mutex
which is held while new workers are created, this could lead to
stalls if a pool's manager is waiting for the previous pool's work
items to release memory. This is almost purely theoretical tho.
Update wq_unbind_fn() such that it sets WORKER_UNBIND /
POOL_DISASSOCIATED, goes over schedule() and explicitly kicks off
execution for a pool and then moves on to the next one.
tj: Updated comments and description.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/mach-netx/generic.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions