summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorShahab Vahedi <shahab@synopsys.com>2024-05-25 06:56:28 +0300
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2024-05-25 20:47:21 +0300
commitdd6a403795f0c7b5c566f86f2ee6b687278d3c1c (patch)
tree365a2e0e7266d9be0554f260d4bd58bf688a8f07 /arch/arc
parent590016ad83de770153a09151336d95544d6bd7ad (diff)
downloadlinux-dd6a403795f0c7b5c566f86f2ee6b687278d3c1c.tar.xz
ARC, bpf: Fix issues reported by the static analyzers
Also updated couple of comments along the way. One of the issues reported was indeed a bug in the code: memset(ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx)) // original line memset(ctx, 0, sizeof(*ctx)) // fixed line That was a nice catch. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405222314.UG5F2NHn-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405232036.Xqoc3b0J-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Shahab Vahedi <shahab@synopsys.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240525035628.1026-1-list+bpf@vahedi.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arc')
-rw-r--r--arch/arc/net/bpf_jit.h2
-rw-r--r--arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c10
-rw-r--r--arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_core.c22
3 files changed, 18 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit.h
index ec44873c42d1..495f3023e4c1 100644
--- a/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
/************** Functions that the back-end must provide **************/
/* Extension for 32-bit operations. */
-inline u8 zext(u8 *buf, u8 rd);
+u8 zext(u8 *buf, u8 rd);
/***** Moves *****/
u8 mov_r32(u8 *buf, u8 rd, u8 rs, u8 sign_ext);
u8 mov_r32_i32(u8 *buf, u8 reg, s32 imm);
diff --git a/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c b/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c
index 31bfb6e9ce00..4458e409ca0a 100644
--- a/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c
+++ b/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ enum {
* If/when we decide to add ARCv2 instructions that do use register pairs,
* the mapping, hopefully, doesn't need to be revisited.
*/
-const u8 bpf2arc[][2] = {
+static const u8 bpf2arc[][2] = {
/* Return value from in-kernel function, and exit value from eBPF */
[BPF_REG_0] = {ARC_R_8, ARC_R_9},
/* Arguments from eBPF program to in-kernel function */
@@ -1302,7 +1302,7 @@ static u8 arc_b(u8 *buf, s32 offset)
/************* Packers (Deal with BPF_REGs) **************/
-inline u8 zext(u8 *buf, u8 rd)
+u8 zext(u8 *buf, u8 rd)
{
if (rd != BPF_REG_FP)
return arc_movi_r(buf, REG_HI(rd), 0);
@@ -2235,6 +2235,7 @@ u8 gen_swap(u8 *buf, u8 rd, u8 size, u8 endian, bool force, bool do_zext)
break;
default:
/* The caller must have handled this. */
+ break;
}
} else {
/*
@@ -2253,6 +2254,7 @@ u8 gen_swap(u8 *buf, u8 rd, u8 size, u8 endian, bool force, bool do_zext)
break;
default:
/* The caller must have handled this. */
+ break;
}
}
@@ -2517,7 +2519,7 @@ u8 arc_epilogue(u8 *buf, u32 usage, u16 frame_size)
#define JCC64_NR_OF_JMPS 3 /* Number of jumps in jcc64 template. */
#define JCC64_INSNS_TO_END 3 /* Number of insn. inclusive the 2nd jmp to end. */
#define JCC64_SKIP_JMP 1 /* Index of the "skip" jump to "end". */
-const struct {
+static const struct {
/*
* "jit_off" is common between all "jmp[]" and is coupled with
* "cond" of each "jmp[]" instance. e.g.:
@@ -2883,7 +2885,7 @@ u8 gen_jmp_64(u8 *buf, u8 rd, u8 rs, u8 cond, u32 curr_off, u32 targ_off)
* The "ARC_CC_SET" becomes "CC_unequal" because of the "tst"
* instruction that precedes the conditional branch.
*/
-const u8 arcv2_32_jmps[ARC_CC_LAST] = {
+static const u8 arcv2_32_jmps[ARC_CC_LAST] = {
[ARC_CC_UGT] = CC_great_u,
[ARC_CC_UGE] = CC_great_eq_u,
[ARC_CC_ULT] = CC_less_u,
diff --git a/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_core.c b/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_core.c
index 6f6b4ffccf2c..e3628922c24a 100644
--- a/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_core.c
+++ b/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_core.c
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static void jit_dump(const struct jit_context *ctx)
/* Initialise the context so there's no garbage. */
static int jit_ctx_init(struct jit_context *ctx, struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
- memset(ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx));
+ memset(ctx, 0, sizeof(*ctx));
ctx->orig_prog = prog;
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static int jit_ctx_init(struct jit_context *ctx, struct bpf_prog *prog)
ctx->prog = bpf_jit_blind_constants(prog);
if (IS_ERR(ctx->prog))
return PTR_ERR(ctx->prog);
- ctx->blinded = (ctx->prog == ctx->orig_prog ? false : true);
+ ctx->blinded = (ctx->prog != ctx->orig_prog);
/* If the verifier doesn't zero-extend, then we have to do it. */
ctx->do_zext = !ctx->prog->aux->verifier_zext;
@@ -1182,12 +1182,12 @@ static int jit_prepare(struct jit_context *ctx)
}
/*
- * All the "handle_*()" functions have been called before by the
- * "jit_prepare()". If there was an error, we would know by now.
- * Therefore, no extra error checking at this point, other than
- * a sanity check at the end that expects the calculated length
- * (jit.len) to be equal to the length of generated instructions
- * (jit.index).
+ * jit_compile() is the real compilation phase. jit_prepare() is
+ * invoked before jit_compile() as a dry-run to make sure everything
+ * will go OK and allocate the necessary memory.
+ *
+ * In the end, jit_compile() checks if it has produced the same number
+ * of instructions as jit_prepare() would.
*/
static int jit_compile(struct jit_context *ctx)
{
@@ -1407,9 +1407,9 @@ static struct bpf_prog *do_extra_pass(struct bpf_prog *prog)
/*
* This function may be invoked twice for the same stream of BPF
- * instructions. The "extra pass" happens, when there are "call"s
- * involved that their addresses are not known during the first
- * invocation.
+ * instructions. The "extra pass" happens, when there are
+ * (re)locations involved that their addresses are not known
+ * during the first run.
*/
struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
{